Current THD analysis in direct model predictive control

Direct model predictive control (MPDxC) appears to be a strong candidate for high-power applications, because it can achieve very low switching frequencies and keep variables of concern, such as power, current, torque and flux, within specified bounds. The width of bounds is observed to regulate THD of a current when MPDxC is used for controlling the current. This paper describes mathematically the linear relationship in between THD and width of the current bounds and, therefore, evaluates THD without running detailed and time consuming simulations. This mathematical function is valid over a range of bound widths for which the current ripple is approximated to be a piecewise linear function. In the case of a three phase system, the function specifies the upper bound of the THD values, whereas an optimized pulse patterns (OPP) specifies the lower bounds of the THD values. The feasibility of the function over a range of bound widths is demonstrated through simulations and experimental results of a 830-VA single phase converter, and simulations of a 6.78-MVA grid-connected three phase converter.

[1]  Tobias Geyer,et al.  A Comparison of Control and Modulation Schemes for Medium-Voltage Drives: Emerging Predictive Control Concepts Versus PWM-Based Schemes , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[2]  Tobias Geyer,et al.  Low complexity model predictive control in power electronics and power systems , 2005 .

[3]  Ralph Kennel,et al.  Predictive control in power electronics and drives , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Marian P. Kazmierkowski,et al.  “Predictive control in power electronics and drives” , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[5]  G. Papafotiou,et al.  Model predictive pulse pattern control , 2011, 2011 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition.

[6]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  A survey of industrial model predictive control technology , 2003 .

[7]  U. K. Madawala,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Current Control of Modular Multi-level Converters , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[8]  T. Geyer,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Current Control: Formulation of the Stator Current Bounds and the Concept of the Switching Horizon , 2012, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine.

[9]  Tobias Geyer,et al.  Model Predictive Pulse Pattern Control for Modular Multilevel Converters , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  T. Geyer,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Current Control for a grid-connected converter: LCL-filter versus L-filter , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[11]  Marian P. Kazmierkowski,et al.  State of the Art of Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control in Power Electronics , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[12]  Pablo Lezana,et al.  Predictive Current Control of a Voltage Source Inverter , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Torque Control—Part I: Concept, Algorithm, and Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Akshay Kumar Rathore,et al.  Synchronous Optimal Pulsewidth Modulation for Low-Switching-Frequency Control of Medium-Voltage Multilevel Inverters , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Udaya K. Madawala,et al.  Model Predictive Direct Current Control of Modular Multilevel Converters: Modeling, Analysis, and Experimental Evaluation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[16]  U. Ammann,et al.  Model Predictive Control—A Simple and Powerful Method to Control Power Converters , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.