Computer-Assisted Thinking Tools: Problem Solving in Graphical Data Analysis

In an effort to infuse problem-solving activities requiring higher-order thinking into inner-city classrooms, we investigated the use of microcomputers with a graphing application program to teach principles of the design and interpretation of graphs to a population of students with little or no prior knowledge of graphs or data analysis. This is an exploratory, naturalistic research study of students' thoughts and behavior in this context. It differs from most earlier work in the field of computer-assisted graphing in three major ways: first, we focus broadly on a wide variety of types of graphs, used in several different subject matter contexts; second, we conduct research into problem solving processes in an unmodified whole-classroom environment; third, we supplement participant observations on student cognition with extensive behavioral sequence data gathered automatically and unobtrusively by the computer. We detail our attempts to develop, adapt, and apply quantitative methods of analysis of behavioral sequences which are potentially applicable to such data gathered for a large number of students.

[1]  Sharon M. Carver,et al.  Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Computer-Assisted Strategic Instruction , 1989 .

[3]  A. Schoenfeld.  Confessions of an Accidental Theorist. , 1987 .

[4]  Carl F. Berger,et al.  Attainment of Skill in Using Science Processes. I. Instrumentation, Methodology and Analysis. , 1982 .

[5]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[7]  H. Gardner,et al.  Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences , 1983 .

[8]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[9]  John Clement,et al.  Adolescents' Graphing Skills: A Descriptive Analysis. , 1985 .

[10]  Elliot Soloway.  What to do next: meeting the challenge of programming-in-the-large , 1986 .

[11]  Janet Graeber.  Graphing in Social Studies. , 1986 .

[12]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Intelligence as Thinking and Learning Skills. , 1981 .

[13]  Sharon Dugdale.  Pathfinder: A Microcomputer Experience in Interpreting Graphs , 1987 .

[14]  R. Pea.  Beyond Amplification : Using the Computer to Reorganize Mental Functioning , 1985 .

[15]  J. Gallagher.  Basic Skills Common To Science and Mathematics , 1979 .

[16]  Charles S. White.  Developing Information-Processing Skills through Structured Activities with a Computerized File-Management Program , 1987 .

[17]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[18]  D. Headon,et al.  The Art of Making Antibodies. , 1986 .

[19]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Confounding in Educational Computing Research , 1985 .

[20]  David Sankoff,et al.  Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison , 1983 .

[21]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development* , 1987 .

[22]  W. G. V. Balchin,et al.  GRAPHICACY SHOULD BE THE FOURTH ACE IN THE PACK , 1966 .

[23]  Michael J. Padilla,et al.  The Construction and Validation of the Test of Graphing in Science (TOGS). , 1986 .

[24]  Temple F. Smith,et al.  New Stratigraphic Correlation Techniques , 1980, The Journal of Geology.

[25]  Michael J. Padilla,et al.  An Examination of the Line Graphing Ability of Students in Grades Seven Through Twelve , 1986 .

[26]  Tim Barclay,et al.  A Graph Is Worth How Many Words , 1987 .

[27]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Analyzing the high frequency bugs in novice programs , 1986 .

[28]  Gordon Wells,et al.  Teacher/Student-Developed Spreadsheet Simulations: A Population Growth Example. , 1986 .

[29]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[30]  Carl F. Berger,et al.  The Importance of Group Size in the Use of Problem-Solving Skills on a Microcomputer , 1985 .

[31]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[32]  E. Eisner.  Learning and teaching the ways of knowing , 1985 .

[33]  Gerald R. Rising,et al.  Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. , 1978 .

[34]  M. Linn,et al.  Evaluations of Science Laboratory Data: The Role of Computer-Presented Information , 1987 .

[35]  W. Patrick Dickson,et al.  Thought-Provoking Software: Juxtaposing Symbol Systems , 1985 .

[36]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Pattern Perception and the Comprehension of Graphs. , 1983 .

[37]  E. Paul Goldenberg,et al.  Mathematics, Metaphors, and Human Factors: Mathematical, Technical, and Pedagogical Challenges in the Educational Use of Graphical Representation of Functions , 1988 .

[38]  Carl F. Berger,et al.  Students' programming behavior in a pascal course , 1987 .