论文信息 - EQ-5D-5L: Smaller steps but a major step change? - 字舞流文

EQ-5D-5L: Smaller steps but a major step change?

J. Brazier | S. Bryan | Andrew Briggs

[1] S. Bryan,et al. Framing of mobility items: a source of poor agreement between preference-based health-related quality of life instruments in a population of individuals receiving assisted ventilation , 2017, Quality of Life Research.

[2] John Cairns,et al. In search of a common currency: A comparison of seven EQ‐5D‐5L value sets , 2018, Health economics.

[3] M. Herdman,et al. Correction to: Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets , 2018, PharmacoEconomics.

[4] J. Brazier,et al. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. , 2014, Health technology assessment.

[5] Brendan Mulhern,et al. New methods for modelling EQ‐5D‐5L value sets: An application to English data , 2017, Health economics.

[6] Aki Tsuchiya,et al. A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the 'lead time' approach. , 2011, Health economics.

[7] Brendan Mulhern,et al. Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England , 2017, Health economics.

[8] G. Bonsel,et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.