Profiling approaches to teaching in higher education: a cluster-analytic study

Teaching approaches in higher education have already been the subject of a considerable body of research. An important contribution was Prosser and Trigwell's development of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI). The present study aims to map out the approaches to teaching profiles of teachers in higher education on the basis of their scores on the ATI. The assignment of teachers to different profiles reflects a particular combination of scores on the ATI, which yields more information relative to teachers' scores on the separate scales. Our results also provide further insight into the validity of the ATI as an instrument for ascertaining teachers' approaches to teaching. Cluster analysis of the ATI data from 377 teachers revealed four profiles. Interview data with 30 teachers enabled us to obtain more detailed pictures of the profiles. Differences between the profiles in terms of gender, discipline and type of higher education institute were analysed.

[1]  Ellen R. Singer,et al.  Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty , 1996 .

[2]  David Kember,et al.  Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning , 1994 .

[3]  Paul A. Gore,et al.  11 – Cluster Analysis , 2000 .

[4]  Katherine Samuelowicz,et al.  Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers , 1992 .

[5]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[6]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[7]  Paul Ginns,et al.  Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised Approaches to teaching inventory , 2005 .

[8]  D. Kember.  A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching , 1997 .

[9]  Anne Nevgi,et al.  The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education , 2007 .

[10]  K. Trigwell,et al.  How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context , 2006 .

[11]  P. Petegem,et al.  Instructional development for teachers in higher education: impact on teaching approach , 2010 .

[12]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[13]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  The Impact Of Training Of University Teachers on their Teaching Skills, their Approach to Teaching and the Approach to Learning of their Students , 2004 .

[14]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  The Approaches to Teaching Inventory: a critique of its development and applicability. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[15]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Growing and Developing as a University Teacher--Variation in Meaning , 2003 .

[16]  Eben A. Weitzman,et al.  Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis , 1996 .

[17]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[18]  David Kember,et al.  Lecturers’ Approaches to Teaching and their Relationship to Conceptions of Good Teaching , 2000 .

[19]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[20]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory , 2004 .

[21]  Liisa Postareff,et al.  Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers , 2008 .

[22]  Candace Lacey,et al.  Teaching Nine to Five: A Study of the Teaching Styles of Male and Female Professors. , 1998 .

[23]  Sven De Maeyer,et al.  Approaches to teaching in higher education: Validation of a Dutch version of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory , 2010 .

[24]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective , 1996 .

[25]  Elaine Martin,et al.  Dissonance in Experience of Teaching and its Relation to the Quality of Student Learning , 2003 .

[26]  Tony Becher.  The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[27]  A. Stes.  The Impact of Instructional Development in Higher Education: Effects on Teachers and Students , 2008 .

[28]  Jan H. F. Meyer.  The modelling of ‘dissonant’ study orchestration in higher education , 2000 .

[29]  G. Lueddeke,et al.  Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A study of disciplinary variation and 'teaching-scholarship' , 2003 .

[30]  Liisa Postareff,et al.  Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education , 2008 .

[31]  David Gijbels,et al.  Student-focused approaches to teaching in relation to context and teacher characteristics , 2008 .

[32]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science , 1994 .