Overcoming Network Overload and Redundancy in Interorganizational Networks: The Roles of Potential and Latent Ties

This paper builds on Granovetter's distinction between strong and weak ties [ Granovetter, M. S. 1973 . The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol.78(6) 1360–1380] in order to respond to recent calls for a more dynamic and processual understanding of networks. The concepts of potential and latent tie are deductively identified, and their implications for understanding how and why networks emerge, evolve, and change are explored. A longitudinal empirical study conducted with companies operating in the European motorsport industry reveals that firms take strategic actions to search for potential ties and reactivate latent ties in order to solve problems of network redundancy and overload. Examples are given, and their characteristics are examined to provide theoretical elaboration of the relationship between the types of tie and network evolution. These conceptual and empirical insights move understanding of the managerial challenge of building effective networks beyond static structural contingency models of optimal network forms to highlight the processes and capabilities of dynamic relationship building and network development. In so doing, this paper highlights the interrelationship between search and redundancy and the scope for strategic action alongside path dependence and structural influences on network processes.

[1]  Margaret A. White,et al.  Learning and Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances: A Social Exchange View , 2005 .

[2]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Organizations , 2006 .

[3]  Emanuela Todeva,et al.  Business Networks: Strategy and Structure , 2006 .

[4]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  R. Breiger.  The Duality of Persons and Groups , 1974 .

[7]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[8]  Mark Jenkins,et al.  Trajectories in the Evolution of Technology: A Multi-Level Study of Competition in Formula 1 Racing , 2001 .

[9]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[10]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[12]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[13]  Harvey Pinney.  The Structure of Social Action , 1940, Ethics.

[14]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[15]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies , 1996 .

[16]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks , 2000 .

[17]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Decay functions , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[19]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .

[20]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Strategic Supplier Segmentation: The Next “Best Practice” in Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[21]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Music on Demand: Composers and Careers in the Hollywood Film Industry , 1982 .

[22]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  DANCING WITH STRANGERS: ASPIRATION PERFORMANCE AND THE SEARCH FOR UNDERWRITING SYNDICATE PARTNERS. , 2004 .

[23]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Investigating the Microstructure of Network Evolution: Alliance Formation in the Mobile Communications Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[24]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[25]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[26]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Freddy Winston Castro.  Explaining Society, Critical Realism in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[28]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[29]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[30]  H. Wannenwetsch,et al.  E-Supply-Chain-Management , 2002 .

[31]  Indre Maurer,et al.  Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance Implications: Lessons from Biotechnology Start-ups , 2006 .

[32]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[34]  W. Powell.  Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[35]  Andrew V. Shipilov,et al.  The Missing Link: The Effect of Customers on the Formation of Relationships Among Producers in the Multiplex Triads , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[37]  O. Williamson.  The economic institutions of capitalism , 1985 .

[38]  Ragnhild Silkoset,et al.  The Dark Side of Social Capital , 2008 .

[39]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Network Evolution: The Origins of Structural Holes , 2009 .

[40]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[41]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  Systems of Exchange , 2004 .

[42]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[43]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[44]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Learning about collaboration. , 2010, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[47]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[48]  Willem Hulsink,et al.  Networking by Entrepreneurs: Patterns of Tie—Formation in Emerging Organizations , 2007 .

[49]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[50]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[52]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[55]  David Obstfeld.  Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[56]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[57]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[58]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[59]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Honeymoons and the Liability of Adolescence: A New Perspective on Duration Dependence in Social and Organizational Relationships , 1991 .

[60]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Small Worlds: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Structure , 2013 .

[61]  David Krackhardt,et al.  WANTED: A Good Network Theory of Organization@@@Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. , 1995 .

[62]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[63]  Bart van Looy,et al.  The Initiation and Evolution of Interfirm Knowledge Transfer in R&D Relationships , 2007 .

[64]  B. Erickson,et al.  Corporate Social Capital and Liability , 2002 .

[65]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[66]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[67]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[68]  T. Parsons,et al.  The Structure of Social Action , 1938 .

[69]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Role of Individual Attachments in the Dissolution of Interorganizational Relationships , 1992 .

[70]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[71]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[73]  J. Bessant,et al.  Finding, Forming, and Performing: Creating Networks for Discontinuous Innovation , 2007 .

[74]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Bringing the Context Back In: Settings and the Search for Syndicate Partners in Venture Capital Investment Networks , 2008 .

[75]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[76]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[77]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Hazards of the Market: The Continuity and Dissolution of Interorganizational Market Relationships , 1998 .

[78]  Matthew Semadeni,et al.  Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[79]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[80]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the firm's debt performance , 2002 .

[81]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[82]  S. Wasserman,et al.  New Frontiers in Network Theory Development , 2006 .

[83]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[84]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[85]  Estelle Brodman,et al.  Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (Book Review) , 1978 .

[86]  Allan Afuah.  How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[87]  Christopher Barnatt,et al.  Beyond Networks and Hierarchies: Latent Organizations in the U.K. Television Industry , 2000 .

[88]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[89]  Joel Podolny.  Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[90]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[91]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Duynamics of Interorganizational Attachments: Auditor-Client Relationships , 1988 .