Spatial Selective Auditory Attention in the Presence of Reverberant Energy: Individual Differences in Normal-Hearing Listeners
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R L Freyman,et al. The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Alexander L. Francis,et al. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[3] Brian Gygi,et al. Individual differences in auditory abilities. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Virginia Best,et al. The Impact of Noise and Hearing Loss on the Processing of Simultaneous Sentences , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[5] R W Hukin,et al. Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] W. Hartmann,et al. The role of reverberation in release from masking due to spatial separation of sources for speech identification , 2005 .
[7] M. Akeroyd. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[8] Joseph W. Hall,et al. Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Michael F. Bunting,et al. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] P. X. Joris,et al. The volley theory and the spherical cell puzzle , 2008, Neuroscience.
[11] Gerald Kidd,et al. The effects of hearing loss and age on the benefit of spatial separation between multiple talkers in reverberant rooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Brian C J Moore,et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[13] F L Wightman,et al. Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Thomas Lunner,et al. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[15] B. Schneider,et al. Effects on speech intelligibility of temporal jittering and spectral smearing of the high-frequency components of speech , 2010, Hearing Research.
[16] Mark R. Anderson,et al. Direct comparison of the impact of head tracking, reverberation, and individualized head-related transfer functions on the spatial perception of a virtual speech source. , 2001, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. Audio Engineering Society.
[17] Karen S Helfer,et al. Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[18] C S Watson,et al. Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] B. Schneider,et al. Effect of age, presentation method, and learning on identification of noise-vocoded words. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Virginia Best,et al. Exploring the benefit of auditory spatial continuity. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] B. Shinn-Cunningham. Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[23] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002, Psychology and aging.
[24] E. C. Cmm,et al. on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .
[25] Signy Sheldon,et al. Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Erika Skoe,et al. Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in ASD and First-Degree Relatives , 2010, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
[27] P. Rabinowitz,et al. Noise-induced hearing loss. , 2000, American family physician.
[28] C. J. Darwin,et al. Chapter 11 – Auditory Grouping , 1995 .
[29] Richard L Freyman,et al. Auditory target detection in reverberation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] P. Carpenter,et al. Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .
[31] Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Bottom-up and top-down influences on spatial unmasking , 2005 .
[32] Chaz Yee Toh,et al. Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] John H Grose,et al. Age Effects in Temporal Envelope Processing: Speech Unmasking and Auditory Steady State Responses , 2009, Ear and hearing.
[34] Bruce A. Schneider,et al. The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002 .
[36] J. Jahnke. PRIMACY AND RECENCY EFFECTS IN SERIAL-POSITION CURVES OF IMMEDIATE RECALL. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.
[37] J. Grose,et al. Processing of Temporal Fine Structure as a Function of Age , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[38] Antje Ihlefeld,et al. Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Lee M. Miller,et al. Auditory attentional control and selection during cocktail party listening. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[40] B. Ross. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.
[41] C. Darwin,et al. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] Mathieu Lavandier,et al. Speech segregation in rooms: monaural, binaural, and interacting effects of reverberation on target and interferer. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] Gurjit Singh,et al. Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2006, Trends in amplification.
[44] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2008, Trends in amplification.
[45] D. Frisina,et al. Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] W. Noble,et al. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[47] Richard L Freyman,et al. Aging and Speech-on-Speech Masking , 2007, Ear and hearing.
[48] Jont B. Allen,et al. Image method for efficiently simulating small‐room acoustics , 1976 .
[49] Michael F. Bunting,et al. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[50] Bernhard Ross,et al. Aging in Binaural Hearing Begins in Mid-Life: Evidence from Cortical Auditory-Evoked Responses to Changes in Interaural Phase , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[51] P. Dawes,et al. Auditory processing disorder in relation to developmental disorders of language, communication and attention: a review and critique. , 2009, International journal of language & communication disorders.
[52] A. Nabelek,et al. Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[53] Torsten Dau,et al. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[54] J. Koehnke,et al. Processing interaural cues in sound segregation by young and middle-aged brains. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[55] T. Lunner,et al. The emergence of cognitive hearing science. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of psychology.
[56] J. Culling,et al. Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[57] Virginia Best,et al. Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[58] Frederick J. Gallun,et al. The advantage of knowing where to listen. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[59] Gerald Kidd,et al. Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] C. Watson,et al. Sources of variation in profile analysis. I. Individual differences and extended training. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[61] M. Liberman,et al. Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[62] Erika Skoe,et al. Neural Timing Is Linked to Speech Perception in Noise , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.