Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner

The ECAT high resolution research tomograph (HRRT) is a dedicated brain and small animal PET scanner, with design features that enable high image spatial resolution combined with high sensitivity. The HRRT is the first commercially available scanner that utilizes a double layer of LSO/LYSO crystals to achieve photon detection with depth-of-interaction information. In this study, the performance of the commercial LSO/LYSO HRRT was characterized, using the NEMA protocol as a guideline. Besides measurement of spatial resolution, energy resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, count rate performance, correction for attenuation and scatter, hot spot recovery and image quality, a clinical evaluation was performed by means of a HR+/HRRT human brain comparison study. Point source resolution varied across the field of view from approximately 2.3 to 3.2 mm (FWHM) in the transaxial direction and from 2.5 to 3.4 mm in the axial direction. Absolute line-source sensitivity ranged from 2.5 to 3.3% and the NEMA-2001 scatter fraction equalled 45%. Maximum NECR was 45 kcps and 148 kcps according to the NEMA-2001 and 1994 protocols, respectively. Attenuation and scatter correction led to a volume uniformity of 6.3% and a system uniformity of 3.1%. Reconstructed values deviated up to 15 and 8% in regions with high and low densities, respectively, which can possibly be assigned to inaccuracies in scatter estimation. Hot spot recovery ranged from 60 to 94% for spheres with diameters of 1 to 2.2 cm. A high quantitative agreement was met between HR+ and HRRT clinical data. In conclusion, the ECAT HRRT has excellent resolution and sensitivity properties, which is a crucial advantage in many research studies.

[1]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  A PET detector with depth-of-interaction determination , 1991 .

[2]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Use of an in-field-of-view shield to improve count rate performance of the single crystal layer high-resolution research tomograph PET scanner for small animal brain scans. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization reconstruction of sinograms with arbitrary noise distribution using NEC-transformations , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Martin G Pomper,et al.  Small animal imaging in drug development. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.

[5]  James F. Young,et al.  MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals , 1996, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[6]  C. C. Watson New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999 .

[7]  Mark W. Lenox,et al.  Correction methods for missing data in sinograms of the HRRT PET scanner , 2002 .

[8]  R. N. Goble,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET P4: a PET system dedicated to animal imaging. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Correction for emission contamination in transmission scans for the high resolution research tomograph , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  C. Comtat,et al.  OSEM-3D reconstruction strategies for the ECAT HRRT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[11]  Dale L. Bailey,et al.  A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners , 1991, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  H. Herzog,et al.  NEMA NU2-2001 guided performance evaluation of four Siemens ECAT PET scanners , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  H. Murayama,et al.  Performance evaluation of a subset of a four-layer LSO detector for a small animal DOI PET scanner: jPET-RD , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Metabolic rates in small brain nuclei determined by high-resolution PET. , 2004, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Michael E Casey,et al.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Wai-Hoi Wong,et al.  An analog decoding BGO block detector using circular photomultipliers , 1995 .

[17]  N. Schramm,et al.  High-resolution SPECT using multi-pinhole collimation , 2002, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[18]  S. Cherry,et al.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Jingli Wang,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography: applications in drug discovery and drug development. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  Investigation of LSO crystals for high spatial resolution positron emission tomography , 1996 .

[21]  A A Lammertsma,et al.  Characterization of a single LSO crystal layer high resolution research tomograph. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Michael E. Casey,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: NEMA NEC evaluation of the HRRT system, the new High Resolution Research Tomograph , 2001 .

[23]  G Brix,et al.  Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000 .

[25]  Roberta Matheoud,et al.  Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Tim Mulnix,et al.  NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  A. Rahmim,et al.  The second generation HRRT - a multi-centre scanner performance investigation , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[28]  Yu Wang,et al.  A comparison of four-image reconstruction algorithms for 3-D PET imaging of MDAPET camera using phantom data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[29]  W. Moses,et al.  Effect of 176Lu background on singles transmission for LSO-based PET cameras. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Jurgen Seidel,et al.  Resolution uniformity and sensitivity of the NIH ATLAS small animal PET scanner: comparison to simulated LSO scanners without depth-of-interaction capability , 2001 .

[31]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Markus Cremer,et al.  Evaluation of the TierPET system , 1998 .

[33]  Michael E. Casey,et al.  HeinzelCluster: accelerated reconstruction for FORE and OSEM3D. , 2002 .

[34]  R M Lewitt,et al.  Performance of the Fourier rebinning algorithm for PET with large acceptance angles. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  Performance results of a new DOI detector block for a high resolution PET-LSO research tomograph HRRT , 1997 .

[36]  Z. Burbar,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: an example of NEMA scatter estimation issues for LSO based PET systems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[37]  P. V. van Rijk,et al.  U-SPECT-I: a novel system for submillimeter-resolution tomography with radiolabeled molecules in mice. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  P M Bloomfield,et al.  PET scanners for small animals. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.