A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion

The principle of loss aversion is thought to explain a wide range of anomalous phenomena involving tradeoffs between losses and gains. In this article, I show that the anomalies loss aversion was introduced to explain --- the risky bet premium, the endowment effect, and the status-quo bias --- are characterized not only by a loss/gain tradeoff, but by a tradeoff between the status-quo and change; and, that a propensity towards the status-quo in the latter tradeoff is sufficient to explain these phenomena. Moreover, I show that two basic psychological principles --- (1) that motives drive behavior; and (2) that preferences tend to be fuzzy and ill-defined --- imply the existence of a robust and fundamental propensity of this sort. Thus, a loss aversion principle is rendered superfluous to an account of the phenomena it was

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[2]  D. Putler Incorporating Reference Price Effects into a Theory of Consumer Choice , 1992 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[4]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[5]  D. Ariely,et al.  Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers , 2000 .

[6]  E. Fama,et al.  The Equity Premium , 2001 .

[7]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[8]  Colin Camerer Three Cheers—Psychological, Theoretical, Empirical—for Loss Aversion , 2005 .

[9]  M. Bar-Hillel,et al.  Why are people reluctant to exchange lottery tickets , 1996 .

[10]  D. Kahneman A Psychological Perspective on Economics , 2003 .

[11]  P. Bernstein,et al.  What Risk Premium Is “Normal”? , 2002 .

[12]  K. Arrow,et al.  Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing , 1966 .

[13]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Mere-Possession Effects without Possession in Consumer Choice , 1997 .

[14]  G. Chapman Similarity and reluctance to trade , 1998 .

[15]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[16]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[17]  D. Bell,et al.  Looking for Loss Aversion in Scanner Panel Data: The Confounding Effect of Price Response Heterogeneity , 2000 .

[18]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[19]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of , 1992 .

[21]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The Boundaries of Loss Aversion , 2005 .

[22]  R. Dhar Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[23]  W. Dubourg,et al.  Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity , 1994 .

[24]  R. Ignatius Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses , 1999 .

[25]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[26]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[28]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects , 1998 .

[29]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[30]  I. Simonson,et al.  Attribute–Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals: , 1997 .

[31]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .