The simplicity of competitive repertoires : An empirical analysis

This research explores the notion of competitive simplicity: a tendency of some firms to concentrate intensely on just a few central activities. Our focus here is the simplicity inherent in the repertoire of concrete, market-oriented actions used by companies to compete: these actions include product introductions, pricing or advertising decisions, and changes in market scope. The simplicity of a competitive repertoire can be assessed by its range of actions and its degree of concentration on one or a few dominant types of actions. We argue that competitive simplicity is largely a function of organizational and environmental properties that attenuate managerial search or restrict knowledge of competitive alternatives. These properties include good performance, munificent, homogeneous or certain markets, a lack of breadth in competitive experiences, and the complacency that may accompany age and size. Paradoxically, although good past performance may contribute to simplicity, simplicity can hurt subsequent performance, especially during periods of uncertainty and growth. Many of these ideas were borne out in a study of the major carriers of the post-deregulation domestic airline industry.

[1]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[2]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[3]  F. Aguilar.  Scanning the business environment , 1967 .

[4]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[5]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[6]  D. Silverman,et al.  The Structure of Organizations. , 1971 .

[7]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[8]  A. Buse,et al.  Goodness of Fit in Generalized Least Squares Estimation , 1973 .

[9]  R. Rumelt.  Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[10]  N. KhandwallaP.  Properties of Competing Organizations , 1976 .

[11]  P. Khandwalla.  The design of organizations , 1977 .

[12]  D. Schendel,et al.  A Strategic Model of the U.S. Brewing Industry: 1952-1971 , 1978 .

[13]  Marshall W. Meyer.  Environments and organizations , 1978 .

[14]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Strategy formulation : analytical concepts , 1978 .

[15]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[16]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[17]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration , 1980 .

[18]  The Sovereign State of ITT , 1981 .

[19]  H. White,et al.  Where do markets come from , 1981 .

[20]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations , 1984 .

[21]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[22]  P. Nystrom,et al.  To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn , 1984 .

[23]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[24]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[25]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  M. Hitt,et al.  Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance , 1985 .

[27]  William D. Berry,et al.  Multiple regression in practice , 1985 .

[28]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[29]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[30]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications , 1986 .

[31]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness , 1986 .

[32]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Challenger: Fine-Tuning the Odds Until Something Breaks , 1988 .

[34]  Elizabeth E. Bailey,et al.  Sources of Economic Rent in the Deregulated Airline Industry , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[35]  Masoud Yasai-Ardekani,et al.  Effects of Environmental Scarcity and Munificence on the Relationship of Context to Organizational Structure , 1989 .

[36]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Permanently Failing Organizations. , 1991 .

[37]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Pooled Time Series Analysis , 1990 .

[38]  E. Ziegel.  Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1989 .

[39]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[40]  R. Pascale.  Managing on the Edge , 1990 .

[41]  Jacques Delacroix,et al.  Cosmetic, Speculative, and Adaptive Organizational Change in the Wine Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 1991 .

[42]  Gary J. Castrogiovanni,et al.  Environmental Munihcence; A Theoretical Assessment , 1991 .

[43]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach , 1991 .

[44]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  J. March.  Decisions and Organizations , 1991 .

[46]  D Miller,et al.  The generic strategy trap. , 1992, The Journal of business strategy.

[47]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility , 1992 .

[48]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses , 1992 .

[49]  David Rogers.  The Future of American Banking , 1992 .

[50]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[51]  Alfred D. Chandler.  Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1992 .

[52]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Architecture of Simplicity , 1993 .

[53]  Heather A. Haveman.  Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation , 1993 .

[54]  M. Schefczyk.  Operational performance of airlines: An extension of traditional measurement paradigms , 1993 .

[55]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .

[56]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organizational Change and Failure. , 1990 .

[57]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Environmental and Organizational Context and Executive Team Structure , 1993 .

[58]  John Steffens,et al.  Newgames: Strategic Competition in the PC Revolution , 1993 .

[59]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1994 .

[60]  David J. Miller,et al.  Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework , 1994 .

[61]  Danny Miller,et al.  WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SUCCESS: THE PERILS OF EXCELLENCE* , 1994 .

[62]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[63]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  The Discipline of Market Leaders , 1995 .