Localization in the presence of a distracter and reverberation in the frontal horizontal plane. II. Model algorithms

Previously, it was shown that humans are able to localize a broadband noise burst quite well, even if it is presented in the presence of a second distracting broadband noise burst at 0-dB target-to-distracter ratio. In this investigation, different model algorithms are tested for their ability to predict the psychoacoustic results. First, a long-time and a running cross-correlation algorithm are introduced to simulate the psychoacoustic experiments. Both algorithms, which are used to analyze the time window in which target and distracter are presented, are not able to estimate the target position as accurately as human listeners. Therefore, a listening test was conducted to find out, if the listeners used the part of the distracter that preceded the target in the previous tests as a reference. The outcome indicates that the onsets of test sound and distracter must be separated temporally; otherwise, human localization performance deteriorates rapidly. These results are incorporated into the interaural cross-correlation difference (ICCD) model, the third model approach that is introduced. For each frequency band, the interaural time differences of the test sound are calculated from the difference in the interaural cross correlation (ICC) of the total sound (target signal+distracter) and the ICC of the distracter alone. The latter is calculated from the part of the distracter that precedes the test sound. The model is able to demonstrate a number of psychoacoustic effects, including shifts in the auditory events for low target-to-distracter ratios.

[1]  E. C. Cherry,et al.  Mechanism of Binaural Fusion in the Hearing of Speech , 1957 .

[2]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms, III: Onset and duration effects. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R. Patterson,et al.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. Gaik,et al.  Combined evaluation of interaural time and intensity differences: psychoacoustic results and computer modeling. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R. Gilkey,et al.  Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  F L Wightman,et al.  Monaural sound localization revisited. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S. Nishida,et al.  Adaptation in the processing of interaural time differences revealed by the auditory localization aftereffect. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Robert A. Butler,et al.  Role of Stimulus Frequency and Duration in the Phenomenon of Localization Shifts , 1964 .

[10]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Extents of laterality and binaural interference effects. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Image method for efficiently simulating small‐room acoustics , 1976 .

[12]  W. Lindemann Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H. Steven Colburn,et al.  Computational Models of Binaural Processing , 1996 .

[14]  Klaus Hartung,et al.  Comparison of Different Methods for the Interpolation of Head-Related Transfer Functions , 1999 .

[15]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[16]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based in auditory-nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Zeiberg,et al.  Lateralization of complex binaural stimuli: a weighted-image model. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.