Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: a bibliometric analysis

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a detailed analysis of the social enterprises (SE) and social entrepreneurship (SEship) literature that has been published in international journals from 1991 to 2010, determining the intellectual structure of both fields and their maturity as academic fields of study. Design/methodology/approach – Using a quantitative methodology for literature study, named bibliometric analysis, relevant papers were obtained from three important international databases, and SE and SEship journals. An initial number of 1,343 records were identified and, after applying various filters, a total of 286 papers were studied for bibliometric indicators and epistemological orientation. Findings – The study identified a significant increase in the scholarly investigation of SE and SEship in recent years, together with greater collaboration and international research. It was demonstrated that some countries are dominating the SE and SEship research area, such as the UK and the USA, whereas institutional and individual research output is spread more equally. Currently, no author or institution dominates the SE and SEship literature. The epistemological orientation suggests that the published literature is largely of a theoretical and descriptive nature in both fields, with only a small number of predictive papers. Originality/value – This paper provides important contributions. First, it presents an intellectual structure of SE and SEship as a discipline. Second, it determines the current maturity of the field based on its epistemological orientation, concluding that SE and SEship are maturing, with theory development followed by empirical testing and validation generating an increase in consensus on the boundaries of the field.

[1]  Janelle A. Kerlin.  Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences , 2006 .

[2]  H. Douglas.  Creating Knowledge: A Review of Research Methods in Three Societal Change Approaches , 2008 .

[3]  D. C. Gash,et al.  Cultures of culture: Academics, practitioners and the pragmatics of normative control , 1988 .

[4]  J. Frame.  National Economic Resources and the Production of Research in Lesser Developed Countries , 1979 .

[5]  J. Mair,et al.  Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight , 2006 .

[6]  Janelle Kerlin,et al.  Social Enterprise: A Global Comparison , 2009 .

[7]  T. Kothari,et al.  Patterns of Meaning in the Social Entrepreneurship Literature: A Research Platform , 2010 .

[8]  Raymond Dart,et al.  The legitimacy of social enterprise , 2004 .

[9]  Adrian Sherwin Morley,et al.  Eight paradoxes of the social enterprise research agenda , 2008 .

[10]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[11]  James K. Hazy,et al.  Complexity and Social Entrepreneurship: A Fortuitous Meeting , 2008 .

[12]  H. Jenkins,et al.  Applying sustainability indicators to the social enterprise business model: The development and application of an indicator set for Newport Wastesavers, Wales , 2006 .

[13]  M. Aiken,et al.  The Governance Challenges of Social Enterprises: Evidence from a UK Empirical Study , 2009 .

[14]  Diana Hicks,et al.  The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[15]  D. Rennie,et al.  Who did what? Authorship and contribution in 2001 , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[16]  Brenda L. Massetti,et al.  The Social Entrepreneurship Matrix as a "Tipping Point" for Economic Change , 2008 .

[17]  I. Hutter,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2010 .

[18]  N. Phillips,et al.  Social Investment through Community Enterprise: The Case of Multinational Corporations Involvement in the Development of Nigerian Water Resources , 2007 .

[19]  S. Kilpatrick,et al.  Are rural health professionals also social entrepreneurs? , 2009, Social science & medicine.

[20]  J. Defourny,et al.  Defining Social Enterprise , 2006 .

[21]  E. Pennings,et al.  A conceptual overview of What We Know About Social Entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[22]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Data set isolation for bibliometric online analyses of research publications: fundamental methodological issues , 1997 .

[23]  G. S. Mort,et al.  Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation , 2010 .

[24]  M. Mendell.  Reflections on the evolving landscape of social enterprise in North America , 2010 .

[25]  J. Oktay.  Grounded Theory , 2012 .

[26]  C. Zografos.  Rurality discourses and the role of the social enterprise in regenerating rural Scotland , 2007 .

[27]  J. Dees.  Taking social entrepreneurship seriously , 2007 .

[28]  Alida Veldsman,et al.  From technologists to social enterprise developers: Our journey as “ICT for development” practitioners in Southern Africa , 2008 .

[29]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.

[30]  B. Lipetz.  Aspects of JASIS Authorship through Five Decades , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Kristin M. Ferguson,et al.  Feasibility Study of the Social Enterprise Intervention With Homeless Youth , 2008 .

[32]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible , 2006, Scientometrics.

[33]  L. Wong,et al.  Entrepreneurs: Care Homes for Elderly People in Chinese Cities , 2006 .

[34]  C. Stevens,et al.  Social Enterprises and the Timing of Conception: Organizational Identity Tension, Management, and Marketing , 2010 .

[35]  H. Haugh.  A research agenda for social entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[36]  Kai Hockerts.  Entrepreneurial Opportunity in Social Purpose Business Ventures , 2006 .

[37]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Changing of the guard , 2009 .

[38]  E. Berman,et al.  Municipal Support for Social Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[39]  Todd W. Moss,et al.  Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities , 2009 .

[40]  B. Cook,et al.  Social Entrepreneurship - false premises and dangerous forebodings , 2003 .

[41]  The social economy of trust: social entrepreneurship experiences in Poland , 2010 .

[42]  Concepción S. Wilson,et al.  The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics , 2001, Scientometrics.

[43]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Social outsourcing as a development tool: The impact of outsourcing IT services to women's social enterprises in Kerala , 2009 .

[44]  H. Donker,et al.  Development Corporations in Aboriginal Communities: The Canadian Experience , 2009 .

[45]  Modes of Governance in the Dutch Social Housing Sector , 2007 .

[46]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance , 2005 .

[47]  A. Pritchard,et al.  Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics , 1969 .

[48]  T. V. Leeuwen.  Descriptive Versus Evaluative Bibliometrics , 2004 .

[49]  M. Rhodes,et al.  Social Entrepreneurship as a Performance Landscape: The Case of 'Front Line' , 2008 .

[50]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995) , 2006, Scientometrics.

[51]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[52]  Roger Spear,et al.  Social entrepreneurship: a different model? , 2006 .

[53]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990–1992 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[54]  S. Martin,et al.  Social Entrepreneurs and Social Inclusion: Building Local Capacity or Delivering National Priorities? , 2005 .

[55]  Nick Bontis,et al.  A scientometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008) , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[56]  Assessing sustainability of faith‐based enterprises in Kenya , 2006 .

[57]  Hamed Armesh,et al.  Waqf as a Social Entrepreneurship Model in Islam , 2010 .

[58]  G. Hogg,et al.  Consumer response to social entrepreneurship: the case of the Big Issue in Scotland , 2002 .

[59]  John L. Thompson.  Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship: where have we reached?: A summary of issues and discussion points , 2008 .

[60]  E. Pennings,et al.  What Do We Know About Social Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Empirical Research , 2010 .

[61]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  International Research Collaboration , 1979 .

[62]  Bob Doherty,et al.  The diverse world of social enterprise: a collection of social enterprise stories , 2006 .

[63]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2008 .

[64]  Prema Basargekar.  Microcredit and a Macro Leap: An Impact Analysis of Annapurna Mahila Mandal (AMM) - An Urban Microfinance Institution in India , 2009 .

[65]  Christine Woods,et al.  A Spiral of Innovation Framework for Social Entrepreneurship: Social Innovation at the Generational Divide in an Indigenous Context , 2008 .

[66]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions , 2003 .

[67]  Sutia Kim Alter.  Social Enterprise: A Typology of the Field Contextualized in Latin America , 2003 .

[68]  G. Desa.  Social Entrepreneurship: Snapshots of a Research Field in Emergence , 2010 .

[69]  Fiona Lettice,et al.  Diversity management for innovation in social enterprises in the UK , 2010 .

[70]  Mark Sanderson.  Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics , 2008 .

[71]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines , 2008, Scientometrics.

[72]  Yinian Gu,et al.  Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis , 2004, Scientometrics.

[73]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[74]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .