Frequency and frequency-ratio resolution by possessors of absolute and relative pitch: examples of categorical perception.

The methodology derived from the trace-context theory of intensity resolution (Durlach and Braida, 1969; Macmillan et al., 1988) was applied to resolution over an octave range along two continua: a sequential-frequency-ratio continuum for possessors of relative pitch (RP), and a pure-tone frequency continuum for possessors of absolute pitch (AP). The performance of both RP and AP possessors was exceptional in that total identification sensitivity along both continua was much greater than identification sensitivity along unidimensional psychophysical continua characterized by the 7 +/- 2 rule. In addition, the performance of RP possessors was exceptional in that, on average, total sensitivity for identification resolution was greater than sensitivity for resolution in discrimination. Finally, identification sensitivity between category prototypes (chromatic semits) along both continua was approximately the same as identification sensitivity between phonemic category prototypes along speech continua, despite the fact that both the discrimination ranges and the total number of categories are much larger for the two pitch continua.

[1]  W. D. Ward,et al.  Categorical perception--phenomenon or epiphenomenon: evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  W. D. Ward,et al.  Categorical Perception of Musical Intervals , 1974 .

[4]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Resolution for speech sounds: basic sensitivity and context memory on vowel and consonant continua , 1988 .

[6]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  B. Repp.  Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings , 1984 .

[8]  E. Terhardt.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical approach to processing modes. , 1987 .

[10]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Theoretical contributions of tests on animals to the special-mechanisms debate in speech. , 1986, Experimental biology.

[11]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A J van Hessen,et al.  Modeling phoneme perception. I: Categorical perception. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Comments on "training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report" [J.S. Logan, S.E. Lively, and D.B. Pisoni, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 874-886 (1991)]. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  W. Siegel,et al.  Absolute identification of notes and intervals by musicians , 1977 .

[15]  N. I. Durlach,et al.  Intensity Perception. II. Resolution in One‐Interval Paradigms , 1972 .

[16]  Absolute and relative pitch revisited on psychoacoustic grounds , 1983 .

[17]  K. Ohgushi,et al.  Perceptual components of pitch: spatial representation using a multidimensional scaling technique. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  W. D. Ward.  Absolute Pitch. Part II , 1963 .

[19]  Vietnamese Modal Scales of the Dan Tranh , 1991 .

[20]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[21]  K. Miyazaki.  Musical pitch identification by absolute pitch possessors , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  G. Balzano.  Absolute pitch and pure tone identification. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A J van Hessen,et al.  Modeling phoneme perception. II: A model of stop consonant discrimination. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D. M. Green,et al.  Comparison of method‐of‐adjustment and forced‐choice procedures in frequency discrimination , 1975 .

[25]  I. Pollack.  The Information of Elementary Auditory Displays , 1952 .

[26]  D. M. Green,et al.  A comparison of method-of-adjustment and forced-choice procedures in frequency discrimination , 1976 .

[27]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Harris Winitz.  Human communication and its disorders : a review , 1990 .

[29]  W. D. Ward.  Subjective Musical Pitch , 1954 .

[30]  A. H. Takeuchi,et al.  Absolute pitch. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  P. Brady,et al.  Fixed-scale mechanism of absolute pitch. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Kemp Dt,et al.  The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. , 1979 .

[33]  D T Kemp.  The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure - evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.