Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics.

[1]  J. Higgins,et al.  Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  L. Hedges,et al.  Basics of meta‐analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity , 2017, Research synthesis methods.

[3]  J. Ioannidis.  The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. , 2016, The Milbank quarterly.

[4]  N. Pandis,et al.  Are dental researchers asking patient-important questions? A scoping review. , 2016, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  J. Gagnier,et al.  Applicable or non-applicable: investigations of clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews , 2016, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[6]  G. Guyatt,et al.  High statistical heterogeneity is more frequent in meta-analysis of continuous than binary outcomes. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  N. Pandis,et al.  The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand? , 2015, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  N. Pandis,et al.  Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? , 2013, European journal of orthodontics.

[9]  David Moher,et al.  Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[10]  Simon G Thompson,et al.  Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  D. Millett.  Bias in Systematic Reviews? , 2011, Journal of orthodontics.

[13]  M. Pittler.  Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta‐analysis in Context , 2010 .

[14]  G. Rücker,et al.  Undue reliance on I2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead , 2008, BMC medical research methodology.

[15]  J. Higgins.  Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. , 2008, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  J. Sterne,et al.  Meta‒Analysis in Stata™ , 2008 .

[18]  Tania B. Huedo-Medina,et al.  Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? , 2006, Psychological methods.

[19]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  P. Coulthard,et al.  The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry. , 2003, European journal of oral sciences.

[21]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  D. Petitti,et al.  Approaches to heterogeneity in meta‐analysis , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  M. Okamoto,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions , 1998 .

[24]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  F Davidoff,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  Fleming.  The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature . Where do we stand ? , 2015 .

[27]  H. Schünemann,et al.  [GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence - inconsistency]. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[28]  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Edited by Julian P. T. Higgins & , 2006 .