Landscape scale ecological monitoring as part of an EIA of major construction activities: experience at the Turkish section of the BTC crude oil pipeline project

Ecological monitoring is a complementary component of the overall environmental management and monitoring program of any Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report. The monitoring method should be developed for each project phase and allow for periodic reporting and assessment of compliance with the environmental conditions and requirements of the EIA. Also, this method should incorporate a variance request program since site-specific conditions can affect construction on a daily basis and require time-critical application of alternative construction scenarios or environmental management methods integrated with alternative mitigation measures. Finally, taking full advantage of the latest information and communication technologies can enhance the quality of, and public involvement in, the environmental management program. In this paper, a landscape-scale ecological monitoring method for major construction projects is described using, as a basis, 20 months of experience on the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan (BTC) Crude Oil Pipeline Project, covering Turkish Sections Lot B and Lot C. This analysis presents suggestions for improving ecological monitoring for major construction activities.

[1]  Enrique R. Vivoni,et al.  Real-time streaming of environmental field data , 2003 .

[2]  Frederick Steiner,et al.  The living landscape : an ecological approach to landscape planning , 2000 .

[3]  Youth,et al.  Guide to good practice , 1993 .

[4]  Bindu N. Lohani,et al.  Environmental impact assessment : for developing countries in Asia , 1997 .

[5]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Development of mobile computing applications for hydraulics and water quality field measurements , 2002 .

[6]  Séverine Vuilleumier,et al.  Map of ecological networks for landscape planning , 2002 .

[7]  Richard A. Carpenter,et al.  Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia : volume one - overview , 1997 .

[8]  R. Forman.  Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1995 .

[9]  A.K.M. Rafique Ahammed,et al.  Environmental impact monitoring in the EIA process of South Australia , 2006 .

[10]  P. Vos,et al.  A Framework for the Design of Ecological Monitoring Programs as a Tool for Environmental and Nature Management , 2000 .

[11]  J. Treweek,et al.  Ecological Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[12]  Douglas J. Lake,et al.  FERC Regulated Third-Party Compliance Monitoring and Variance Request Program— A Case Study during Construction of the Alliance Pipeline Project , 2002 .

[13]  Tapani Sarjakoski,et al.  NETWORKED GIS FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION— EMPHASIS ON UTILIZING IMAGE DATA , 1998 .

[14]  A. Porter,et al.  Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century , 1998 .

[15]  Philip J. Stapleton,et al.  Environmental management systems : an implementation guide for small and medium-sized organizations , 2001 .

[16]  António Câmara,et al.  Promoting the use of environmental data collected by concerned citizens through information and communication technologies. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes , 2006 .

[18]  Lynne Caughlan,et al.  Cost considerations for long-term ecological monitoring , 2001 .

[19]  Harvey F. Ludwig,et al.  Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia. 1. Overview. 2. Selected case studies. , 1997 .

[20]  Mustafa Balat,et al.  Baku-Tbilisi Ceyhan Oil Pipeline (BTC) Project and Turkey: Investments, Future Developments and Environmental Impacts , 2005 .

[21]  Linda Kokemuller.  The Value of a Third Party Inspection Program During the Construction of Natural Gas Pipelines in Maine , 2002 .

[22]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Online tools for public participation , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..