Response Plant Functional Types and Effect Plant Functional Types

One of the recurrent themes in plant ecology and range management is the need to scale information from specific case studies towards broader ecological patterns and processes. Information must be interpreted and applied at larger scales because the most serious challenges to natural resource management operate at regional and global scales. A central problem encountered when scaling vegetation responses to regional levels is our limited ability to quantify and interpret complex floristic responses involving a large number of individual species. This provides a strong justification for the development of a more generalized pattern of vegetation responses involving a manageable number of plant groups that have similar life history strategies and responses to environmental stress and disturbance (McIntyre, 1999). The concept of plant functional types provides a promising tool to bridge the gap between specific, detailed studies and broader scale problems. Plant functional types are sets of plants exhibiting similar responses to environmental conditions and having similar effects on the dominant ecosystem processes (Gitay and Noble, 1997). The classification of plant species into similar groups based on their morphological and physiological traits provides new insights into the dynamics of vegetation change and associated ecological processes.

[1]  M. Roderick,et al.  Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology , 1999 .

[2]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Disturbance response in vegetation – towards a global perspective on functional traits , 1999 .

[3]  S. Díaz,et al.  Plant functional traits, ecosystem structure and land-use history along a climatic gradient in central-western Argentina , 1999 .

[4]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Grazing response groups among understorey plants in arid rangelands , 1999 .

[5]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Plant response to disturbance in a Mediterranean grassland: How many functional groups? , 1999 .

[6]  A. Perevolotsky,et al.  The effect of shrub clearing and grazing on the composition of a Mediterranean plant community: functional groups versus species , 1999 .

[7]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Allocating C-S-R plant functional types : a soft approach to a hard problem , 1999 .

[8]  A. Perevolotsky,et al.  Role of Grazing in Mediterranean Rangeland Ecosystems Inversion of a paradigm , 1998 .

[9]  David J. Augustine,et al.  Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities; herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance , 1998 .

[10]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysiological traits predict the nature of biotic interactions and individual plant species effects in ecosystems? , 1998 .

[11]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[12]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  D. Briske,et al.  Demographic evaluation of a herbivory-sensitive perennial bunchgrass : does it possess an Achilles heel ? , 1997 .

[15]  S. Díaz,et al.  Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change , 1997 .

[16]  M. Rausher,et al.  VARIATION IN THE DEFENSE STRATEGIES OF PLANTS: ARE RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE? , 1997 .

[17]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[18]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Plant functional types as predictors of transient responses of arctic vegetation to global change , 1996 .

[19]  Elgene O. Box,et al.  Plant functional types and climate at the global scale , 1996 .

[20]  V. Anderson,et al.  Herbivore‐Induced Species Replacement in Grasslands: Is it Driven by Herbivory Tolerance or Avoidance? , 1995 .

[21]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation. , 1995 .

[22]  John H. Lawton,et al.  What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[23]  H. Mooney,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function , 1994, Praktische Zahnmedizin Odonto-Stomatologie Pratique Practical Dental Medicine.

[24]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  T. O’Connor Composition and population responses of an African savanna grassland to rainfall and grazing , 1994 .

[26]  O. Sala,et al.  Plant functional types and ecological strategies in Patagonian forbs , 1993 .

[27]  Céline Boutin,et al.  A functional classification of wetland plants , 1993 .

[28]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils Over a Global Range of Environments , 1993 .

[29]  S. Díaz,et al.  Morphological analysis of herbaceous communities under different grazing regimes , 1992 .

[30]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Classifying plants into groups on the basis of associations of individual traits: evidence from Australian semi-arid woodlands , 1992 .

[31]  F. D. Pineda,et al.  Adaptation of ecological systems: compositional patterns of species and morphological and functional traits , 1991 .

[32]  M. Ludlow,et al.  Comparative responses of the Savanna grasses Cenchrus ciliaris and Themeda triandra to defoliation , 1989, Oecologia.

[33]  O. Sala,et al.  A Generalized Model of the Effects of Grazing by Large Herbivores on Grassland Community Structure , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[34]  J. H. Manwaring,et al.  Rapid shifts in phosphate acquisition show direct competition between neighbouring plants , 1987, Nature.

[35]  M. Hay Associational Plant Defenses and the Maintenance of Species Diversity: Turning Competitors Into Accomplices , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[36]  S. McNaughton Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory , 1983 .

[37]  P. Coley,et al.  HERBIVORY AND DEFENSIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TREE SPECIES IN A LOWLAND TROPICAL FOREST , 1983 .

[38]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Community stability, complexity and species life history strategies , 1982, Vegetatio.

[39]  I. Noble,et al.  The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances , 1980, Vegetatio.

[40]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[41]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[42]  J. F. Arnold Plant Life-form Classification and its Use in Evaluating Range Conditions and Trend. , 1955 .

[43]  E. J. Dyksterhuis Condition and Management of Range Land Based on Quantitative Ecology. , 1949 .

[44]  Christen Raunkiaer,et al.  The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography; being the collected papers of C. Raunkiaer. , 1935 .

[45]  M. Westoby The LHS strategy scheme in relation to grazing and fire , 1999 .

[46]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Ecological Assembly Rules: Functional implications of trait–environment linkages in plant communities , 1999 .

[47]  I. R. Noble,et al.  What are functional types and how should we seek them , 1997 .

[48]  H. Mooney,et al.  Functional roles of biodiversity: a global perspective , 1996 .

[49]  E. Simms,et al.  Costs of plant resistance to herbivory. , 1992 .