Clinical Outcomes After Immediate and Late Implant Loading for a Single Missing Tooth in the Anterior Maxilla

Purpose:This study compared the clinical outcomes of 1-year follow-up of immediate and late implant loading after implant restoration of a single tooth in the anterior maxilla. Materials and Methods:Thirty-three patients with missing teeth in the anterior maxilla were included in this study (18 immediate loading and 15 late loading). Standard periapical radiographs were obtained to evaluate the vertical bone loss around the implant. For both implant groups, periimplant parameters (probing depth, gingival bleeding index, gingival index (GI), modified plaque index, width of keratinized gingiva) were evaluated. Results:There were no significant differences in bone loss, the widths of keratinized gingiva, the GI, and modified plaque index between the immediate implant loading and late implant loading groups (P > 0.05). A significant difference in the probing depth was observed between these groups at the initial and 1-month evaluations (P < 0.05). Significant differences in bleeding indices between these groups were observed at months 3 and 6 (P < 0.05). Conclusions:When selecting appropriate patients (adequate primary stability, patient compliance with the surgeon's recommendations), immediate implant loading may be an alternative method to late loading protocol for replacement of a missing tooth in anterior maxilla.

[1]  A. Piattelli,et al.  Survival and complication rates of fixed restorations supported by locking-taper implants: a prospective study with 1 to 10 years of follow-up. , 2014, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  D. Peñarrocha-Oltra,et al.  Single-blind randomized clinical trial to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after one year of immediate versus delayed implant placement supporting full-arch prostheses , 2013, Medicina Oral.

[3]  A. McCullagh,et al.  Immediate loading in the maxillary arch: evidence-based guidelines to improve success rates: a review. , 2011, The Journal of oral implantology.

[4]  A. Vissink,et al.  Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  G. Romanos,et al.  Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  Bjarni E Pjetursson,et al.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years , 2008, BDJ.

[7]  Christoph H F Hämmerle,et al.  A systematic review of marginal soft tissue at implants subjected to immediate loading or immediate restoration. , 2006, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  C. Misch,et al.  Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  F. Kroon,et al.  Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. , 2006, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  Jean-Pierre Bernard,et al.  Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  R. Cohen Position paper: periodontal maintenance. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[12]  Michele Leone,et al.  Restoration of partially edentulous patients using dental implants with a microtextured surface: a prospective comparison of delayed and immediate full occlusal loading. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  Björn Klinge,et al.  A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  C. Kreulen,et al.  A systematic review of single-tooth restorations supported by implants. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  N Meredith,et al.  Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  J. Wennström,et al.  The influence of the masticatory mucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  A H Geering,et al.  Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  H Löe,et al.  The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. , 1967, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  Matthias Karl,et al.  In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.