Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs.

PURPOSE To retrospectively compare the accuracy of observer performance with personal computer (PC) compared with that with dedicated picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstation display in the detection of wrist fractures on computed radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2002 version) of the World Medical Association. The institutional clinical board approved the study; informed consent was not required. Seven observers independently assessed randomized anonymous digital radiographs of the wrist from 259 subjects; 146 had fractures, and 113 were healthy control subjects (151 male and 108 female subjects; average age, 33 years). Follow-up radiographs and/or computed tomographic scans were used as the reference standard for patients with fractures, and follow-up radiographs and/or clinical history data were used as the reference standard for controls. The PC was a standard hospital machine with a 17-inch (43-cm) color monitor with which Web browser display software was used. The PACS workstation had two portrait 21-inch (53-cm) monochrome monitors that displayed 2300 lines. The observers assigned scores to the radiographs on a scale of 1 (no fracture) to 5 (definite fracture). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared. RESULTS The areas under the ROC curves were almost identical for the PC and workstation (0.910 vs 0.918, respectively; difference, 0.008; 95% confidence interval: -0.029, 0.013). The average sensitivity with the PC was almost identical to that with the workstation (85% vs 84%, respectively), as was the average specificity (82% vs 81%, respectively). The average accuracy (83%) was the same for both. CONCLUSION The results of this study showed that there was no difference in accuracy of observer performance for detection of wrist fractures with a PC compared with that with a PACS workstation.

[1]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Anthony J Doyle,et al.  Personal computer-based PACS display system: comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[3]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[4]  K. Yamauchi,et al.  Evaluation of a PC-based teleconferencing system for reading chest radiographs , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[5]  A R Cowen,et al.  Reporting requirements for skeletal digital radiography: comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy presentation. , 1998, Radiology.

[6]  G M Kolodny,et al.  A low-cost, full-function picture archiving and communication system using standard PC hardware and the traditional 4-over-4 display format. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  W Döhring,et al.  Subtle pulmonary abnormalities: detection on monitors with varying spatial resolutions and maximum luminance levels compared with detection on storage phosphor radiographic hard copies. , 1998, Radiology.

[8]  H E Rockette,et al.  Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs. , 2000, Radiology.

[9]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[10]  S K Lee,et al.  An economical, personal computer-based picture archiving and communication system. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  G Svahn,et al.  Spatial Resolution Requirements in Digital Radiography of Scaphoid Fractures , 1996, Acta radiologica.

[12]  E Krupinski,et al.  Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[13]  T Liebig,et al.  Shortcomings of low-cost imaging systems for viewing computed radiographs. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.