Seedlings from Large Seeds Tolerated Defoliation Better: A Test Using Phylogeneticaly Independent Contrasts

The characteristic seed size of a plant species may reflect evolution toward an optimal compromise between size and number of seeds produced. The extent to which large seed size conveys an advantage to a seedling probably varies according to circum- stances, and this may explain at least some ofthe great variation in seed size among species. Here we test whether large-seeded species are better able than small-seeded species to withstand defoliation at the seedling stage. We compared growth and survival of seedlings of 40 species of Australian angiosperms after removing 95% of their photosynthetic tissue shortly after emergence. We accounted for effects of phylogeny by selecting pairs of species that were "phylogenetically independent contrasts." That is, the phylogenetic path con- necting the two species of any pair was independent ofthe path connecting the two species of any other pair we used. We also selected the species so that the two members of each pair differed at least 10-fold in seed mass. Therefore, each pair provided an independent case for examining the consequences of evolutionary divergence in seed size. We found that the larger seeded species survived loss of photosynthetic tissue better than the smaller seeded species in 14 ofthe 16 pairs for which there was a significant difference in survival. The extent to which growth of survivors was reduced by loss of photosynthetic tissue also differed in 8 pairs, with the large-seeded species being less affected in 6 of these cases. We conclude that large seed size is generally associated with greater ability of seedlings to cope with loss of photosynthetic tissue. Consequently, large seed size may be favored in any circumstances in which seedlings are likely to experience carbon deficit early in develop? ment.

[1]  M. Fenner.  A COMPARISON OF THE ABILITIES OF COLONIZERS AND CLOSED-TURF SPECIES TO ESTABLISH FROM SEED IN ARTIFICIAL SWARDS , 1978 .

[2]  A. Grafen.  The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[4]  B. McArdle.  The structural relationship: regression in biology , 1988 .

[5]  Andy Purvis,et al.  Comparative methods for explaining adaptations , 1991, Nature.

[6]  K. Gross.  Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants , 1984 .

[7]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Seed Size and Plant Growth Form as Factors in Dispersal Spectra , 1990, Ecology.

[8]  J. Denslow.  Notes on the seedling ecology of a large-seeded species of Bombacaceae. , 1980 .

[9]  M. Pagel,et al.  Recent Developments in the Analysis of Comparative Data , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[10]  E. J. Kraus.  The Reproductive Capacity of Plants , 1943, Ecology.

[11]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seedling growth in relation to seed size among species of arid Australia , 1992 .

[12]  S. Mazer.  Ecological, Taxonomic, and Life History Correlates of Seed Mass Among Indiana Dune Angiosperms , 1989 .

[13]  M. Westoby,et al.  Diaspore weight, dispersal, growth form and perenniality of central australian plants , 1991 .

[14]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[15]  J. Black.  Competition between plants of different initial seed sizes in swards of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) with particular reference to leaf area and the light microclimate , 1958 .

[16]  K. Gross,et al.  Colonizing Abilities of 'Biennial' Plant Species in Relation to Ground Cover: Implications for their Distributions in a Successional Sere , 1982 .

[17]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Integrated Responses of Plants to Stress , 1991 .

[18]  D. Tilman.  Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. (MPB-26), Volume 26 , 1988 .

[19]  M. Ridley.  The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating , 1983 .

[20]  H. G. Baker.  Seed Weight in Relation to Environmental Conditions in California , 1972 .

[21]  R. Peters,et al.  The allometry of seed weight and seedling relative growth rate. , 1990 .

[22]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[23]  A. Burt.  Comparative methods using phylogenetically independent contrasts , 1989 .

[24]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. , 1975 .

[25]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[26]  M. Willson,et al.  Plant reproductive ecology , 1983 .

[27]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.