Fundamental limits of image registration performance: effects of image noise and resolution in CT-guided interventions

Purpose: In image-guided procedures, image acquisition is often performed primarily for the task of geometrically registering information from another image dataset, rather than detection / visualization of a particular feature. While the ability to detect a particular feature in an image has been studied extensively with respect to image quality characteristics (noise, resolution) and is an ongoing, active area of research, comparatively little has been accomplished to relate such image quality characteristics to registration performance. Methods: To establish such a framework, we derived Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) for registration accuracy, revealing the underlying dependencies on image variance and gradient strength. The CRLB was analyzed as a function of image quality factors (in particular, dose) for various similarity metrics and compared to registration accuracy using CT images of an anthropomorphic head phantom at various simulated dose levels. Performance was evaluated in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) of the registration parameters. Results: Analysis of the CRLB shows two primary dependencies: 1) noise variance (related to dose); and 2) sum of squared image gradients (related to spatial resolution and image content). Comparison of the measured RMSE to the CRLB showed that the best registration method, RMSE achieved the CRLB to within an efficiency factor of 0.21, and optimal estimators followed the predicted inverse proportionality between registration performance and radiation dose. Conclusions: Analysis of the CRLB for image registration is an important step toward understanding and evaluating an intraoperative imaging system with respect to a registration task. While the CRLB is optimistic in absolute performance, it reveals a basis for relating the performance of registration estimators as a function of noise content and may be used to guide acquisition parameter selection (e.g., dose) for purposes of intraoperative registration.

[1]  Grace J Gang,et al.  Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance. , 2011, Medical physics.

[2]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  Michael Unser,et al.  Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  D. Robinson,et al.  Fundamental performance limits in image registration , 2004, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[7]  William Vennart,et al.  ICRU Report 54: Medical imaging—the assessment of image quality: ISBN 0-913394-53-X. April 1996, Maryland, U.S.A. , 1997 .

[8]  Luis Ibáñez,et al.  The Design of SimpleITK , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[9]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Unified iso-SNR approach to task-directed imaging in flat-panel cone-beam CT , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. , 2001, Medical physics.

[11]  Imam Samil Yetik,et al.  Performance bounds on image registration , 2006, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[12]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography). , 2000, Medical physics.

[13]  A. Sisniega,et al.  Technical Note: spektr 3.0—A computational tool for x-ray spectrum modeling and analysis , 2016, Medical physics.

[14]  Sailes K. Sengijpta Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory , 1995 .

[15]  David R. Haynor,et al.  Nonrigid multimodality image registration , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.