Assessing Territorial Impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese Case

Abstract This article examines the territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy in Portugal, between 1990 and 2010, at the national level. To reach some conclusions, after a brief overview of the existing literature on territorial impact assessment (TIA) procedures, we present the main features of a proposed TIA technique, which we called TARGET_TIA, and applied to our study case. This analysis permitted us to go beyond the general scope of the EU Cohesion Policy evaluations, which concentrate mainly on the socioeconomic and environmental dimensions, by placing on evidence other key-territorial dimensions, such as Territorial Governance/Cooperation and Polycentricity. Findings indicate that, in general, the EU Cohesion Policy had positive territorial impacts in Portugal, namely by supporting the construction of absent and necessary physical infrastructures. However, the lack of spatial planning and strategic vision limited a more effective and efficient use of Cohesion Funds in Portugal.

[1]  Eduardo Medeiros.  Euro–Meso–Macro: The New Regions in Iberian and European Space , 2013 .

[2]  Guillaume Junqua,et al.  Environmental assessment of a territory: an overview of existing tools and methods. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  J. R. Diez,et al.  The Impact of Academic Mobility on the Creation of Localized Intangible Assets , 2012 .

[4]  R. Ries,et al.  The quantification of the embodied impacts of construction projects on energy, environment, and society based on I-O LCA , 2011 .

[5]  A. Faludi,et al.  Cohesion Policy Contributing to Territorial Cohesion : Future Scenarios , 2011 .

[6]  M. Golobič,et al.  Territorial impact assessment: integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies. , 2011, Evaluation and program planning.

[7]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Mapping the European regional educational distribution , 2011 .

[8]  C. Ranci.  Competitiveness and Social Cohesion in Western European Cities , 2011 .

[9]  Laura Polverari,et al.  Financial Accountability and European Union Cohesion Policy , 2011 .

[10]  Eduardo Medeiros.  (Re)defining the Euroregion Concept , 2011 .

[11]  G. Garnero,et al.  The territorial and landscape impacts of photovoltaic systems: Definition of impacts and assessment of the glare risk , 2009 .

[12]  R. Crescenzi.  Undermining the Principle of Concentration? European Union Regional Policy and the Socio-economic Disadvantage of European Regions , 2009 .

[13]  C. George,et al.  Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development: European Practice and Experience , 2007 .

[14]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances , 2006 .

[15]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy , 2006 .

[16]  J. Bachtler,et al.  Evaluation of European Union Cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges , 2006 .

[17]  R. Martin,et al.  Evaluating the impact of the structural funds on objective 1 regions: An exploratory discussion , 2006 .

[18]  W. Huber.  Evaluation of European Union cohesion policy: Window-dressing, formal exercise or coordinated learning process? , 2006 .

[19]  Sarah C. E. Batterbury.  Principles and purposes of European Union Cohesion policy evaluation , 2006 .

[20]  Andrea Mairate.  The ‘added value’ of European Union Cohesion policy , 2006 .

[21]  T. Grosse.  Euro-Commentary: An Evaluation of the Regional Policy System in Poland , 2006 .

[22]  Richard Hummelbrunner.  Process Monitoring of lmpacts: Proposal for a New Approach to Monitor the lmplementation of Structural Fund Programmes , 2005 .

[23]  João Ferrão.  A emergência de estratégias transnacionais de ordenamento do território na União Europeia: reimaginar o espaço europeu para criar novas formas de governança territorial? , 2004 .

[24]  A. Scott,et al.  Regions, Globalization, Development , 2003 .

[25]  F. Vanclay,et al.  Integrating environmental and social impact assessment , 2003 .

[26]  R. Florida.  Cities and the Creative Class , 2003 .

[27]  C Worth,et al.  Added Value , 2003 .

[28]  Á. D. L. Fuente.  Does cohesion policy work? Some general considerations and evidence from Spain , 2002 .

[29]  Jorge Bateira,et al.  Questioning EU Cohesion Policy in Portugal , 2002 .

[30]  Ash Amin,et al.  Behind the Myth of European Union: Propects for Cohesion , 2002 .

[31]  L. Albrechts.  Genesis of a Western European Spatial Policy? , 1997 .

[32]  Larry W. Canter,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment , 1995 .

[33]  J. Bachtler,et al.  Strengthening Economic and Social Cohesion? The Revision of the Structural Funds , 1994 .

[34]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Spatial Impact Analysis in Developing Countries: Method and Application , 1989 .

[35]  Harvey Armstrong,et al.  Regional Economics and Policy , 1985 .

[36]  Johannes Klein,et al.  ESPON Climate Climate Change and Territorial Effects on Regions and Local Economies , 2013 .

[37]  Oto Potluka.  Impact of EU cohesion policy in Central Europe , 2010 .

[38]  C. George.  Proportionate Impact Assessment: Discretion, Formalism, and the Undefined Responsibilities of European Decision-Makers , 2010 .

[39]  K. Bizer,et al.  The European impact assessment and the environment , 2010 .

[40]  Riccardo regstdcenzi.  Undermining the Principle of Concentration? European Union Regional Policy and the Socio-economic Disadvantage of European Regions , 2009 .

[41]  K. Helming,et al.  Ex-ante Impact Assessments (IA) in the European Commission — an overview , 2008 .

[42]  J. Vogt,et al.  Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes , 2008 .

[43]  Growing Regions, Growing Europe , 2008 .

[44]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Sustainability Impact Assessment of land use policies , 2008 .

[45]  Adolf Ebel,et al.  Air, water and soil quality modelling for risk and impact assessment , 2007 .

[46]  Umberto Janin Rivolin Yoccoz.  ESPON project 2.3.2. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. Final Report , 2007 .

[47]  R. Camagni.  Territorial Impact Assessment - TIA: a methodological Proposal , 2006 .

[48]  J. Borg,et al.  The Role and Spatial effects of Cultural Heritage and Identity , 2006 .

[49]  G. Cotella,et al.  ESPON Project 2.3.1., Application and effects of the ESDP in the Member States. Second Interim Report , 2006 .

[50]  U. J. Rivolin.  ESPON project 2.3.2. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. Second Interim Report , 2006 .

[51]  Grétar Thór Eythórsson,et al.  ESPON Action 2.1.5: Territorial Impacts of European Fisheries Policy , 2005 .

[52]  Hussein Abaza,et al.  Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment : towards an integrated approach , 2004 .

[53]  H. Delorme.  Evaluation du rapport final ESPON Projet 2.1.3 : "The territorial Impact of CAP and Rural Development Policy" , 2004 .

[54]  M. Wegener,et al.  Territorial Impact of EU Transport and TEN Policies , 2003 .

[55]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[56]  S. Lubbe,et al.  The Economic and Social Impacts of E-Commerce , 2003 .

[57]  S. Davies,et al.  Review of the impact of pre-accession aid and the adoption of the acquis, in Kujath et al: ESPON 2.2.2 pre-accession aid impact analysis, second interim report , 2003 .

[58]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  An information tool for citizens to assess impacts of climate change from a regional perspective , 2001 .

[59]  Laureano Lázaro Araújo.  El desarrollo local y los fondos estructurales , 1999 .

[60]  Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union , 1999 .

[61]  R. Brunet.  Étudier la pauvreté [Séchet R. (1996). Espaces et pauvretés. La géographie interrogée. Paris : L'Harmattan] , 1997 .

[62]  A. Amin,et al.  STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES TO COHESION , 1995 .

[63]  Critical analysis of the ESPON project 2 . 4 . 1 : Territorial Trends and Policy Impacts in the Field of EU Environmental Policy , 2022 .