Incorporation of Time-of-Flight Information Reduces Metal Artifacts in Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Simulation Study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe and evaluate the influence of time-of-flight (TOF) information on metal artifact reduction in positron emission tomography (PET) image quality in clinical simultaneous PET/magnetic resonance (MR) scanning. Materials and MethodsA total of 7 patients with various malignant tumors were included and underwent a PET/MR examination after standard PET/computed tomography. Baseline TOF and non-TOF PET images were reconstructed. Next, the TOF and non-TOF PET reconstructions were repeated after the introduction of artificial signal voids in the attenuation map to simulate metal artifacts of various sizes in a range of locations. Three different sizes of signal voids were inserted in the attenuation maps for each location of interest: over the maxilla, humeral head, chest, sternum, thoracic and lumbar spine, as well as the femoral head to replicate clinically relevant metal artifacts. The reconstructed images with the artifacts were then compared with the baseline reconstructed images. The mean percentage error in a region of interest surrounding the simulated artifact was used to compare between TOF and non-TOF images. Further comparison between TOF and non-TOF images was performed using histogram analysis. ResultsIn all cases, the mean percentage error in a region of interest surrounding the simulated artifact was reduced when TOF information was included in the reconstruction. The inclusion of TOF also changes the distribution of smaller errors away from the origin of the artifact. In some anatomical regions, an increase in the number of small errors was noted with TOF, although the differences with non-TOF were minimal. ConclusionsPositron emission tomographic imaging benefits from the integration of TOF information in simultaneous PET/MR. The inclusion of TOF information in simultaneous PET/MR imaging reduces errors related to metal artifacts at the site of the artifact.

[1]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Hybrid PET/MR Imaging of the Heart: Potential, Initial Experiences, and Future Prospects , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Bernd J Pichler,et al.  Principles of PET/MR Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Felix Nensa,et al.  Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future perspectives. , 2014, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[4]  Craig S. Levin,et al.  Prototype time-of-flight PET ring integrated with a 3T MRI system for simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging , 2013 .

[5]  Timothy G. Turkington,et al.  Attenuation artifacts and time-of-flight PET , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[6]  M. Conti.  Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  F Hofheinz,et al.  Evaluation and automatic correction of metal-implant-induced artifacts in MR-based attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MR imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Patrick Veit-Haibach,et al.  Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-DPET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Felix Nensa,et al.  Clinical applications of PET/MR: current status and future perspectives , 2014 .

[11]  G. Delso,et al.  Evaluation of an Atlas-Based PET Head Attenuation Correction Using PET/CT & MR Patient Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  Jeong-Hee Kim,et al.  Individually differentiated serotonergic raphe nuclei measured with brain PET/MR imaging. , 2014, Radiology.

[13]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Accurate PET/MR Quantification Using Time of Flight MLAA Image Reconstruction , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[14]  S. Reeder,et al.  Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Patrick Veit-Haibach,et al.  Workflow Considerations in PET/MR Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Steven G. Ross,et al.  Application and Evaluation of a Measured Spatially Variant System Model for PET Image Reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Update on Time-of-Flight PET Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  W. T. Dixon.  Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. , 1984, Radiology.

[20]  M. Conti.  Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  D. Townsend,et al.  An Assessment of the Impact of Incorporating Time-of-Flight Information into Clinical PET/CT Imaging , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Ian Law,et al.  Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone , 2014, NeuroImage.

[24]  Patrick Veit-Haibach,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced PET/MR Imaging Versus Contrast-Enhanced PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer: How Much MR Information Is Needed? , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  S. Thiruvenkadam,et al.  Comparison of 4-class and continuous fat/water methods for whole-body, MR-based PET attenuation correction , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[26]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a simple lesion detection task with time-of-flight PET , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  G. Antoch,et al.  Oncologic PET/MRI, Part 1: Tumors of the Brain, Head and Neck, Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.