How design theories enable the design of generic technologies: Notion of generic concept and genericity improvement

Generic technologies enable to create benefits across wide range of industrial applications. Though providing important insights on generic technologies commercialization, less attention was paid to generic technologies creation. Then, is it possible to design directly generic technologies? Can the intention to build genericity be expressed ex ante? The proposed study indicates that formal design theories provide powerful mechanism of genericity construction when the environments are initially fixed and partially unknown. It is demonstrated that starting point to design generic technology is a generic concept. In addition to a concept definition proposed by C-K theory, the descriptors associated to the domain of existence were added. The generic concept targets the existence domains that are not reduced to one solution but several of them both known or partially unknown. Moreover, it is highlighted that different descriptors of existence domain can lead to various genericity levels. The economic reasoning behind the genericity building provides insights on the dynamics of engineering systems.

[1]  E. Garnsey,et al.  Commercializing Generic Technology: The Case of Advanced Materials Ventures , 2005 .

[2]  W. Powell.  Explaining Technological Change , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  D. Landes.  Why Are We So Rich and They So Poor , 1990 .

[4]  Offer Shai,et al.  Infused design. I. Theory , 2004 .

[5]  A. Gawer.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[6]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Technological Breakthroughs and Productivity Growth , 2006 .

[7]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[8]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes , 2003 .

[9]  Julio R. Bastida.  Field Extensions and Galois Theory , 1984 .

[10]  Kenneth I. Carlaw,et al.  Economic Transformations: General Purpose Technologies and Long Term Economic Growth , 2006 .

[11]  K. Frenken,et al.  The Early Development of the Steam Engine: An Evolutionary Interpretation using Complexity Theory , 2004 .

[12]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards an ontology of design: lessons from C–K design theory and Forcing , 2013 .

[13]  Hiroyuki Yoshikawa,et al.  Design Theory for CAD/CAM Integration , 1985 .

[14]  Tom Nicholas,et al.  Was Electricity a General Purpose Technology? Evidence from Historical Patent Citations , 2004 .

[15]  Janusz Bryzek,et al.  Impact of MEMS technology on society , 1996 .

[16]  Yoram Reich,et al.  A critical review of General Design Theory , 1995 .

[17]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms , 1999 .

[18]  Yoram Reich,et al.  A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH OF DESIGN THEORIES USING GENERATIVENESS AND ROBUSTNESS , 2011 .

[19]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[20]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  Search, Learning and Accumulation of Technological Competences; The Case of Optoelectronics , 1994 .

[21]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  A General-Purpose Technology at Work: The Corliss Steam Engine in the Late-Nineteenth-Century United States , 2004 .

[22]  S. Broadberry.  Economic transformations : general purpose technologies and long-term economic growth , 2006 .