Visual-vestibular interaction during standing, walking, and running.

In artificial laboratory situations where subjects undergo repetitive self-generated or externally imposed head rotations, visual-vestibular interaction during the wearing of telescopic spectacles can markedly augment gain of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). The present study was conducted to determine whether the wearing of these aids for the visually impaired is associated with similar visual-vestibular interaction during more natural activities. Angular eye and head movements of unrestrained normal volunteers were measured using magnetic search coils. In some subjects, head translations and rotations were also monitored by a flux gate magnetometer array. Measurements were performed of the VOR in darkness, and of the visually enhanced VOR (VVOR) in lit conditions, during three natural activities: 1) standing quietly; 2) walking in place; 3) running in place. These data were compared with similar measurements during repetitive voluntary head oscillations at 0.8 Hz in pitch or yaw. During VVOR, subjects viewed a target placed 6 to 10 m away and remembered this target during VOR trials in darkness. To assess the effects of altering visual-vestibular interactions, VVOR testing during normal vision was augmented by wearing of binocular telescopic spectacles of 2X, 4X, and 6X powers. Dorsoventral and mediolateral head translations were consistently phase-locked with pitch and yaw head rotations, respectively, such that head translation at least partially compensated for rotational disturbances of gaze. Angular velocity of the head was greater during walking than during standing, and was greater still during running, with a greater increase in each case for pitch as compared with yaw. Eye movements were phase compensatory for head movements. VOR gain (eye velocity divided by head velocity) was near 1.0 in both pitch and yaw during standing and during actively generated head rotation. During walking and running there was a significant decrease in angular VOR gain in pitch to approximately 0.75 (P < 0.0005). During ambulatory activities, normal and magnified vision were associated with VVOR gain enhancement in pitch and yaw that was statistically significant, but substantially less than was telescope magnification and markedly lower than was the corresponding VVOR gain measured during active head rotation. Measurements of unmagnified VOR and VVOR during walking and running showed that gain was lower than the "ideal" value of 1.0. However, since translational head perturbations during these activities partially offset the visual effects of angular disturbances, lower gains may nevertheless be associated with retinal image stability at typical indoor target distances. In contrast with performance during repetitive, uniplanar motion, vision has very limited influence on VOR gain during natural activities.

[1]  W. P. Huebner,et al.  Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  R. Leigh,et al.  Instability of gaze during locomotion in patients with deficient vestibular function , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[3]  R. Yee,et al.  Velocities of vertical saccades with different eye movement recording methods. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J. Demer,et al.  Effect of telescopic spectacles on head stability in normal and low vision. , 1990, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[5]  R W Baloh,et al.  Visual‐Vestibular Interaction during High‐Frequency, Active Head Movements in Pitch and Yaw a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  J J Bloomberg,et al.  The Effects of Target Distance on Eye and Head Movement during Locomotion , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Validation of physiologic predictors of successful telescopic spectacle use in low vision. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  A. Bradley Noninvasive assessment of the visual system , 1991 .

[9]  Effect of aging on vertical visual tracking and visual-vestibular interaction. , 1994, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[10]  J. Demer,et al.  Dynamic visual acuity of normal subjects during vertical optotype and head motion. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  D. Robinson,et al.  A METHOD OF MEASURING EYE MOVEMENT USING A SCLERAL SEARCH COIL IN A MAGNETIC FIELD. , 1963, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[12]  M Takahashi,et al.  Effect of labyrinthine dysfunction upon head oscillation and gaze during stepping and running. , 1988, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  E. Hirasaki,et al.  Analysis of head and body movements of elderly people during locomotion. , 1993, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[14]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Human gaze stability in the horizontal, vertical and torsional direction during voluntary head movements, evaluated with a three-dimensional scleral induction coil technique , 1987, Vision Research.

[15]  R W Baloh,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in humans during active and passive, vertical head movement. , 1993, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[16]  F. Guedry,et al.  Sensing and Controlling Motion--Vestibular and Sensorimotor Function. Proceedings of a conference. July 7-11, 1991, Palo Alto, California. , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Evaluation of VOR function with gaze stabilization. , 1988, Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[18]  C. Möller,et al.  The effect of stimulus predictability and age on human tracking eye movements. , 1988, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[19]  J. Demer,et al.  Mechanisms of human vertical visual-vestibular interaction. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  G. Barnes,et al.  Predictive velocity estimation in the pursuit reflex response to pseudo‐random and step displacement stimuli in man. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  L. Snyder,et al.  Effect of viewing distance and location of the axis of head rotation on the monkey's vestibuloocular reflex. I. Eye movement responses. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  R. Leigh,et al.  High‐Frequency Vestibuloocular Reflex as a Diagnostic Tool a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  H. Collewijn Eye‐ and head movements in freely moving rabbits. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  J. Demer Evaluation of Vestibular and Visual Oculomotor Function , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[25]  S. H. Seidman,et al.  Behavior of human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex in response to high-acceleration stimuli , 1989, Brain Research.

[26]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Quality of retinal image stabilization during small natural and artificial body rotations in man , 1979, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Demer,et al.  Predictors of functional success in telescopic spectacle use by low vision patients. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Precise recording of human eye movements , 1975, Vision Research.

[29]  R D Yee,et al.  Linear model for visual-vestibular interaction. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[30]  J. Demer,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction with telescopic spectacles. , 1991, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.