An analysis of the social structure of remix culture

We present findings from our study of a music sharing and remixing community in an effort to quantify and understand the structural characteristics of commons-based peer production for products of aesthetic/cultural or entertainment value. We also provide a normative perspective on the strategies that such communities should employ with respect to the use of 'remixing contests', which are popular means of attracting new user-creators to the community and boosting its creative output. Until now research has shied away from the quantitative study of what lies at the heart of this 'remix culture', i.e. remixing, presumably because of the difficulties inherent in attaining relevant large datasets amenable to numerical analysis and an early focus of research efforts on communities whose products serve a more functional purpose (e.g., open source software), rather than aiming at entertainment or personal and artistic expression. This paper contributes to the literature of social network analysis of online communities, the literature on commons-based peer production, and the research agenda of cultural analytics.

[1]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  Graph structure in the Web , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[2]  Rishab Ghosh.  CODE : collaborative ownership and the digital economy , 2005 .

[3]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms , 2007, WWW '07.

[4]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy , 2008 .

[5]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[6]  Graham Vickery,et al.  Participative Web And User-Created Content: Web 2.0 Wikis and Social Networking , 2007 .

[7]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something , 2008, WWW.

[8]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[9]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[10]  M. Bauwens.  The Political Economy of Peer Production , 2005 .

[11]  C. Brannigan.  CODE: Collaborative Ownership and the Digital Economy , 2006 .

[12]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[13]  Warren B. Chik,et al.  Taking Stock of the Creative Commons Experiment Monitoring the Use of Creative Commons Licenses and Evaluating its Implications for the Future of Creative Commons and for Copyright Law , 2007 .

[14]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Free culture - the nature and future of creativity , 2008 .

[15]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[16]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  The Structure and Dynamics of Networks: (Princeton Studies in Complexity) , 2006 .

[17]  Sebastian Wernicke,et al.  FANMOD: a tool for fast network motif detection , 2006, Bioinform..

[18]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[19]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[20]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[21]  R. Armstrong.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More , 2008 .