Ultrahigh‐resolution mapping of peatland microform using ground‐based structure from motion with multiview stereo

Microform is important in understanding wetland functions and processes. But collecting imagery of and mapping the physical structure of peatlands is often expensive and requires specialized equipment. We assessed the utility of coupling computer vision-based structure from motion with multiview stereo photogrammetry (SfM-MVS) and ground-based photos to map peatland topography. The SfM-MVS technique was tested on an alpine peatland in Banff National Park, Canada, and guidance was provided on minimizing errors. We found that coupling SfM-MVS with ground-based photos taken with a point and shoot camera is a viable and competitive technique for generating ultrahigh-resolution elevations (i.e., <0.01 m, mean absolute error of 0.083 m). In evaluating 100+ viable SfM-MVS data collection and processing scenarios, vegetation was found to considerably influence accuracy. Vegetation class, when accounted for, reduced absolute error by as much as 50%. The logistic flexibility of ground-based SfM-MVS paired with its high resolution, low error, and low cost makes it a research area worth developing as well as a useful addition to the wetland scientists' toolkit.

[1]  Christopher Spence,et al.  Deployment of an unmanned aerial system to assist in mapping an intermittent stream , 2016 .

[2]  J. Wheaton Uncertainty in Morphological Sediment Budgeting of Rivers , 2008 .

[3]  H. Franklin Percival,et al.  Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Delineate Fine-Scale Wetland Vegetation Communities , 2014, Wetlands.

[4]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[5]  Maria Strack,et al.  Effect of water table drawdown on peatland dissolved organic carbon export and dynamics , 2008 .

[6]  Masaki Hayashi,et al.  Simple equations to represent the volume - area - depth relations of shallow wetlands in small topographic depressions. , 2000 .

[7]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Feedback control of the rate of peat formation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  K. Anderson,et al.  Laser scanning of fine scale pattern along a hydrological gradient in a peatland ecosystem , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  M. Strack,et al.  Saturated hydraulic conductivity in Sphagnum‐dominated peatlands: do microforms matter? , 2014 .

[10]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[11]  S. Robson,et al.  Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application , 2012 .

[12]  M. Turetsky,et al.  Wildfire as a key determinant of peatland microtopography , 2015 .

[13]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[14]  Sven Frei,et al.  Surface micro-topography causes hot spots of biogeochemical activity in wetland systems: A virtual modeling experiment , 2012 .

[15]  K. Anderson,et al.  What does airborne LiDAR really measure in upland ecosystems? , 2015 .

[16]  P. Morris,et al.  Microform‐scale variations in peatland permeability and their ecohydrological implications , 2016 .

[17]  Stephen E. Darby,et al.  Linking geomorphic changes to salmonid habitat at a scale relevant to fish , 2010 .

[18]  James Brasington,et al.  Computational and methodological aspects of terrestrial surface analysis based on point clouds , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[19]  Paul J. Morris,et al.  Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands , 2015 .

[20]  S. Lane,et al.  Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel‐bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing , 2003 .

[21]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  Alternatives to the Median Absolute Deviation , 1993 .

[22]  M. Nungesser Modelling microtopography in boreal peatlands: hummocks and hollows , 2003 .

[23]  P. Dale,et al.  Identifying Mosquito Habitat Microtopography in an Australian Mangrove Forest Using LiDAR Derived Elevation Data , 2010, Wetlands.

[24]  J. Zedler,et al.  How sedge meadow soils, microtopography, and vegetation respond to Sedimentation , 2002, Wetlands.

[25]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[26]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[27]  K. Anderson,et al.  Using airborne thermal imaging data to measure near‐surface hydrology in upland ecosystems , 2015 .

[28]  J. Brasington,et al.  Modeling river bed morphology, roughness, and surface sedimentology using high resolution terrestrial laser scanning , 2012 .

[29]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Point Cloud Generation from Aerial Image Data Acquired by a Quadrocopter Type Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Digital Still Camera , 2012, Sensors.

[30]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method , 1992, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  D. Sumner Effects of capillarity and microtopography on wetland specific yield , 2007, Wetlands.

[32]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[33]  T. A. Hanley,et al.  PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN RIPARIAN WETLANDS—A TEST OF BIODIVERSITY THEORY , 1998 .

[34]  J. Brasington,et al.  Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets , 2009 .

[35]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[36]  Andrew M. Cunliffe,et al.  Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale quantification of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[37]  J. Brasington,et al.  Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry , 2014 .

[38]  David L. Cotten,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems and Structure from Motion Revolutionize Wetlands Mapping , 2015 .

[39]  F. Visser,et al.  Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[40]  C. Ahn,et al.  Characterization of microtopography and its influence on vegetation patterns in created wetlands , 2007, Wetlands.

[41]  Jon Knight,et al.  Exploring LiDAR data for mapping the micro-topography and tidal hydro-dynamics of mangrove systems: an example from southeast Queensland, Australia. , 2009 .

[42]  Patrice E. Carbonneau,et al.  Cost‐effective non‐metric photogrammetry from consumer‐grade sUAS: implications for direct georeferencing of structure from motion photogrammetry , 2017 .

[43]  Paul Bolstad,et al.  Mapping northern wetlands with high resolution satellite images and LiDAR , 2009, Wetlands.

[44]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Reconstructing flash flood magnitudes using ‘Structure-from-Motion’: A rapid assessment tool , 2014 .

[45]  J. Dietrich Riverscape mapping with helicopter-based Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry , 2016 .

[46]  W. Appels,et al.  Microtopography as a Driving Mechanism for Ecohydrological Processes in Shallow Groundwater Systems , 2012 .

[47]  Chris E. Jordan,et al.  A methodological intercomparison of topographic survey techniques for characterizing wadeable streams and rivers , 2014 .