Bridging Action Frames: Instagram Infographics in U.S. Ethnic Movements

Instagram infographics are a digital activism tool that have redefined action frames for technology-facilitated social movements. From the 1960s through the 1980s, United States ethnic movements practiced collective action: ideologically unified, resource-intensive traditional activism. Today, technologically enabledmovements have been categorized as practicing connective action: individualized, low-resource online activism. Yet, we argue that Instagram infographics are both connective and collective. This paper juxtaposes the insights of past and present U.S. ethnic movement activists and analyzes Black Lives Matter Instagram data over the course of 7 years (2014-2020). We find that Instagram infographic activism bridges connective and collective action in three ways: (1) Scope for Education: Visually enticing and digestible infographics reduce the friction of information dissemination, facilitating collective movement education while preserving customizability. (2) Reconciliation for Credibility: Activists use connective features to combat infographic misinformation and resolve internal differences, creating a trusted collective movement front. (3) High-Resource Efforts for Transformative Change: Instagram infographic activism has been paired with boots on the ground and actionoriented content, curating a connective-to-collective pipeline that expends movement resources. Our work unveils the vitality of evaluating digital activism action frames at the movement integration level, exemplifies the powerful coexistence of connective and collective action, and offers meaningful design implications for activists seeking to leverage this novel tool.

[1]  Divya Siddarth,et al.  Engaging the Crowd: Social Movement Building via Online Bystander Mobilization , 2020, ICTD.

[2]  W. Bennett,et al.  Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests , 2011 .

[3]  R. Mendonça,et al.  Populism as Parody: The Visual Self-Presentation of Jair Bolsonaro on Instagram , 2020 .

[4]  Micah Sherr,et al.  Does Being Verified Make You More Credible?: Account Verification's Effect on Tweet Credibility , 2019, CHI.

[5]  Irene Reppa,et al.  An Empirical Study on Using Visual Embellishments in Visualization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Ning Wang,et al.  Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media , 2016, Soc. Networks.

[7]  Benjamin Bach,et al.  Cheat Sheets for Data Visualization Techniques , 2020, CHI.

[8]  Sucheta Ghoshal,et al.  Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Marc Jay,et al.  Using crowdsourcing to support pro-environmental community activism , 2013, CHI.

[10]  Philip Pond,et al.  Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere , 2017 .

[11]  E. Kelly The Black Panther Party , 2013 .

[12]  Christopher A. Brooks,et al.  Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts , 2010, CHI.

[13]  Marlon Twyman Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia: Collaboration and Collective Memory around Online Social Movements , 2016 .

[14]  J. Birks Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age , 2014 .

[15]  Deen Freelon,et al.  Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice , 2016 .

[16]  W. Lowe,et al.  Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements , 2015 .

[17]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Happenstance, Strategies and Tactics: Intrinsic Design in a Volunteer-based Community , 2016, NordiCHI.

[18]  Lei Shi,et al.  She gets a sports car from our donation: rumor transmission in a Chinese microblogging community , 2013, CSCW.

[19]  Hanspeter Pfister,et al.  What Makes a Visualization Memorable? , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Joan M. Donovan After the #Keyword: Eliciting, Sustaining, and Coordinating Participation Across the Occupy Movement , 2018 .

[21]  Jennifer Suzanne Earl,et al.  THE DYNAMICS OF PROTEST-RELATED DIFFUSION ON THE WEB , 2010 .

[22]  Lisen Selander,et al.  Digital Action Repertoires and Transforming a Social Movement Organization , 2016, MIS Q..

[23]  Jun Liu,et al.  Technology for Activism: Toward a Relational Framework , 2021, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  Max Halupka,et al.  Contentious connective action: a new kind of life-political association for problematizing how expert systems operate , 2017 .

[25]  William Wei,et al.  The Asian American Movement. , 1993 .

[26]  Kari Steen-Johnsen,et al.  Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides? , 2013, New Media Soc..

[27]  Ponnurangam Kumaraguru,et al.  TweetCred: Real-Time Credibility Assessment of Content on Twitter , 2014, SocInfo.

[28]  F. Moughrabi Review: The Rise of the Arab American Left , 2018 .

[29]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  From slacktivism to activism: participatory culture in the age of social media , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  M. Castells ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .

[31]  T. V. Reed The Art of Protest: Culture and Activism from the Civil Rights Movement to the Streets of Seattle , 2005 .

[32]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Credibility in Online Social Networks: A Survey , 2019, IEEE Access.

[33]  E. Pavan Embedding Digital Communications Within Collective Action Networks: A Multidimensional Network Approach , 2014 .

[34]  John H. Parmelee,et al.  Insta-Politicos: Motivations for Following Political Leaders on Instagram , 2019, Social Media + Society.

[35]  Alvin B. Tillery What Kind of Movement is Black Lives Matter? The View from Twitter , 2019, The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics.

[36]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Credibility and the Dynamics of Collective Attention , 2016, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  Steven Franconeri,et al.  ISOTYPE Visualization: Working Memory, Performance, and Engagement with Pictographs , 2015, CHI.

[38]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[39]  Peter Van Aelst,et al.  INTERNET AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT ACTION REPERTOIRES , 2010 .

[40]  Leysia Palen,et al.  (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising , 2012, CSCW.

[41]  Limor Shifman,et al.  Digital political infographics: A rhetorical palette of an emergent genre , 2018, New Media Soc..

[42]  Michael Chan,et al.  Social media use and university students' participation in a large-scale protest campaign: The case of Hong Kong's Umbrella Movement , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[43]  P. Gerbaudo Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism , 2012 .

[44]  Robert M. Mason,et al.  Characterizing Online Rumoring Behavior Using Multi-Dimensional Signatures , 2015, CSCW.

[45]  T. E. D. Yeo,et al.  Rethinking mediated political engagement: social media ambivalence and disconnective practices of politically active youths in Hong Kong , 2019, Chinese Journal of Communication.

[46]  Phiona Stanley Unlikely hikers? Activism, Instagram, and the queer mobilities of fat hikers, women hiking alone, and hikers of colour , 2019, Mobilities.

[47]  Daniel Cohen-Or,et al.  Exploring Visual Information Flows in Infographics , 2020, CHI.

[48]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[49]  Rudolfo A. Anaya,et al.  Aztlán : essays on the Chicano homeland , 1989 .

[50]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Information credibility on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[51]  Rodney K. Brunson,et al.  The Revolution Might Not Be Televised (But It Will Be Lived Streamed) , 2018 .

[52]  Yee Man Margaret Ng,et al.  Connective action or collective inertia? Emotion, cognition, and the limits of digitally networked resistance , 2021, Social Movement Studies.

[53]  Kara Poe Alexander,et al.  Chapter 12. The Intimate Screen: Revisualizing Understandings of Down Syndrome through Digital Activism on Instagram , 2017 .

[54]  Clayton A. Davis,et al.  The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use , 2017 .

[55]  Zeynep Tufekci Twitter and Tear Gas , 2020 .

[56]  Alicia Garza A Herstory of the #BlackLivesMatter Movement , 2014 .

[57]  Kate Starbird,et al.  How Information Snowballs: Exploring the Role of Exposure in Online Rumor Propagation , 2016, CSCW.

[58]  Fiona Suwana Digital Activism in Bali: The ForBALI Movement , 2020 .