Improving the quality of eye care with tele-ophthalmology: shared-care glaucoma screening

We evaluated a shared-care tele-ophthalmology service initiated by the Rotterdam Eye Hospital and 10 optometrists working in retail optician stores. The optometrists screened their clients with a nerve fibre analyser and the resulting images were then further assessed by trained technicians at the hospital. We analysed data from 1729 patients and measured several indicators of the quality of the work as well as its efficiency and effectiveness. The quality of the images was at least satisfactory in most cases (89%), and the agreement between the optometrists and the hospital about normal or suspect test results was high (81%). Only 27% of the patients were called for additional testing at the hospital department and 11% consulted an ophthalmologist. Eighty new cases of glaucoma were detected. The combination of task redesign and telemedicine accounted for the success of the screening service. Task redesign was needed to transfer screening from the hospital to primary care in a safe and responsible way. Telemedicine was crucial for assuring quality, facilitating information exchange and for coordination.

[1]  D Beauregard,et al.  Diagnosis of glaucoma using telemedicine – the effect of compression on the evaluation of optic nerve head cup–disc ratio , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[2]  H. Lemij,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of the GDx: Clinical Judgment of Standard Printouts Versus the Number , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.

[3]  Donald Berwick,et al.  Developing and Testing Changes in Delivery of Care , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  D. Henson,et al.  Community refinement of glaucoma referrals , 2003, Eye.

[5]  D. Hailey,et al.  Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  A. Hofman,et al.  Changing views on open-angle glaucoma: definitions and prevalences--The Rotterdam Study. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  H. Uusitalo,et al.  Telemedicine in ophthalmology. , 2003, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[8]  D. Greenfield,et al.  Optic nerve and retinal nerve fiber layer analyzers in glaucoma , 2002, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[9]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Using information systems to measure and improve quality , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  H. Lemij,et al.  The value of polarimetry in the evaluation of the optic nerve in glaucoma , 2001, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[11]  D. Easty,et al.  The Bristol shared care glaucoma study: outcome at follow up at 2 years , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  R. Stamper Glaucoma screening. , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.

[13]  M. W. Tuck,et al.  How can we improve the detection of glaucoma? , 1995, BMJ.

[14]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Glaucoma detection using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal polarization compensation. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  A. Juutinen,et al.  The application of teleophthalmology in examining patients with glaucoma: a pilot study. , 1999, Journal of glaucoma.

[16]  R. O. Schultz,et al.  Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  R A Tang,et al.  Telemedicine screening of glaucoma. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[18]  S. Ito,et al.  Use of telemedicine in periodic screening of diabetic retinopathy. , 2003, Telemedicine journal and e-health.