Building community capacity and social infrastructure through landcare: a case study of land grant engagement

In the struggle to remain true to their technical assistance and civic engagement missions in an era of shrinking budgets and increasingly complex accountability claims, land grant universities have developed different engagement strategies to contribute to the development of surrounding communities. Drawing on Flora and Flora’s (in Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci, 48, 1993) assertion that a strong and “entrepreneurial” social infrastructure is critical for facilitating lasting change and development in communities (particularly rural communities), this article presents a case study of a land grant university’s engagement with a community landcare group from the perspective of building social capacity in surrounding communities. This case explores Virginia Tech’s involvement in facilitating and supporting Catawba Landcare using three theoretical frames—Ronald Heifetz’s concept of “holding environments” as a safe and facilitated space where social learning can occur; ecological and social entrepreneurship and the roles and functions required to support these forms of entrepreneurship; and the concept of learning action networks in which otherwise disparate partners are linked under common goals and collectively learn how to manage the situation at hand. Using these three theoretical frames, this paper posits landcare as a model of engagement for land grant universities thus contributing to the construction of social infrastructure.

[1]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Conceiving land grant university community engagement as adaptive leadership , 2011 .

[2]  Stuart A. Rosenfeld Networks and clusters: the yin and yang of rural development , 2001 .

[3]  R. Christy,et al.  Essential Forms of Capital for Sustainable Community Development , 2003 .

[4]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[5]  Terry Marsden,et al.  Ecological entrepreneurship: sustainable development in local communities through quality food production and local branding , 2005 .

[6]  Daniel T. Lichter,et al.  Rural America in an Urban Society: Changing Spatial and Social Boundaries , 2011 .

[7]  Cornelia Butler Flora,et al.  Entrepreneurial Social Infrastructure: A Necessary Ingredient , 1993 .

[8]  D. Cohen Chronicle of Higher Education , 1998 .

[9]  D. Freshwater Rural Development and the Declining Coherence of Rural Policy: An American and Canadian Perspective , 2007 .

[10]  G. Spanier Enhancing the Quality of Life: A Model for the 21st-Century Land-Grant University , 1999 .

[11]  G. Alperovitz,et al.  The Next Wave: Building a University Civic Engagement Service for the Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[12]  Nancy E. Franklin The Need Is Now: University Engagement in Regional Economic Development , 2009 .

[13]  D. Drake,et al.  Extension: A Modern Day Pony Express? , 2006 .

[14]  George R. McDowell,et al.  Land Grant Universities and Extension into the 21st Century: Renegotiating or Abandoning a Social Contract , 2001 .

[15]  Ronald A. Heifetz,et al.  Leadership Without Easy Answers , 1996 .

[16]  A. Campbell Facilitating Landcare: conceptual and practical dilemmas , 1995 .

[17]  G. Mcdowell Engaged Universities: Lessons from the Land-Grant Universities and Extension , 2003 .

[18]  Max Stephenson Of Land Grants, Leadership, Nonprofits and Social Change: A Model for Catalyzing Sustained Community-Based Learning and Change , 2003 .

[19]  David A. Tandberg Politics, Interest Groups and State Funding of Public Higher Education , 2010 .