Surveillance of hemodialysis vascular access with ultrasound vector flow imaging

The aim of this study was prospectively to monitor the volume flow in patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) with the angle independent ultrasound technique Vector Flow Imaging (VFI). Volume flow values were compared with Ultrasound dilution technique (UDT). Hemodialysis patients need a well-functioning vascular access with as few complications as possible and preferred vascular access is an AVF. Dysfunction due to stenosis is a common complication, and regular monitoring of volume flow is recommended to preserve AVF patency. UDT is considered the gold standard for volume flow surveillance, but VFI has proven to be more precise, when performing single repeated instantaneous measurements. Three patients with AVF were monitored with UDT and VFI monthly for five months. A commercial ultrasound scanner with a 9 MHz linear array transducer with integrated VFI was used to obtain data. UDT values were obtained with Transonic HD03 Flow-QC Hemodialysis Monitor. Three independent measurements at each scan session were obtained with UDT and VFI each month. Average deviation of volume flow between UDT and VFI was 25.7 % (Cl: 16.7% to 34.7%) (p= 0.73). The standard deviation for all patients, calculated from the mean variance of each individual scan sessions, was 199.8 ml/min for UDT and 47.6 ml/min for VFI (p = 0.002). VFI volume flow values were not significantly different from the corresponding estimates obtained using UDT, and VFI measurements were more precise than UDT. The study indicates that VFI can be used for surveillance of volume flow.

[1]  N M Krivitski,et al.  Theory and validation of access flow measurement by dilution technique during hemodialysis. , 1995, Kidney international.

[2]  Giovanni Morana,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurement in detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in native forearm arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. , 2003, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[3]  M. Bots,et al.  Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula patency revisited: results of a prospective, multicenter initiative. , 2008, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[4]  J. Jensen Estimation of Blood Velocities Using Ultrasound: A Signal Processing Approach , 1996 .

[5]  Giuseppe Verlato,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Access Blood Flow Surveillance in Arteriovenous Fistulas , 2014, Seminars in dialysis.

[6]  Michael Bachmann Nielsen,et al.  Accuracy and sources of error for an angle independent volume flow estimator , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[7]  William L Whittier,et al.  Surveillance of Hemodialysis Vascular Access , 2009, Seminars in interventional radiology.

[8]  J. Éthier,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. , 2006, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[9]  K. Hughes,et al.  Hemodialysis access. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[10]  Antonio Lupo,et al.  Adding access blood flow surveillance to clinical monitoring reduces thrombosis rates and costs, and improves fistula patency in the short term: a controlled cohort study. , 2008, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[11]  J. Jensen,et al.  A new method for estimation of velocity vectors , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  G. Chertow,et al.  The elderly patients on hemodialysis. , 2010, Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology.

[13]  J. Bittl,et al.  Catheter interventions for hemodialysis fistulas and grafts. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  Vassilis Vargemezis,et al.  Vascular access for hemodialysis: postoperative evaluation and function monitoring , 2014, International Urology and Nephrology.

[15]  J. M. Hansen,et al.  Comparison of real-time in vivo spectral and vector velocity estimation. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  B. Boura,et al.  Long-term preservation of native arteriovenous dialysis fistulas. , 2014, Annals of vascular surgery.

[17]  Richard Marais,et al.  Transonic, thermodilution, or ionic dialysance to manage vascular access: Which method is best? , 2014, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[18]  L. Moist,et al.  Vascular access surveillance: an ongoing controversy. , 2012, Kidney international.

[19]  Clark J Zeebregts,et al.  Within-session and between-session variability of haemodialysis shunt flow measurements. , 2005, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[20]  R. Foley,et al.  The growing economic burden of diabetic kidney disease , 2009, Current diabetes reports.

[21]  Francesco Casucci,et al.  The Key Role of Color Doppler Ultrasound in the Work‐up of Hemodialysis Vascular Access , 2015, Seminars in dialysis.

[22]  Mads Møller Pedersen,et al.  Volume flow in arteriovenous fistulas using vector velocity ultrasound. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  B. Nonnast-Daniel,et al.  Colour Doppler ultrasound in dialysis access. , 2004, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[24]  Marie Godet,et al.  Arteriovenous Fistula , 2020, Definitions.

[25]  M Surlan,et al.  The role of interventional radiology in management of patients with end-stage renal disease. , 2003, European journal of radiology.