The empathic care robot: A prototype of responsible research and innovation

Science fiction prototypes are often used to visualise or represent novel technologies or other techno-scientific innovations. The present paper follows this tradition and describes a prototype of a care robot that is endowed with affective capabilities. The paper describes some of the potential ethical problems arising from such a technology. This aspect of the paper is based on prior research in a European-funded technology foresight project that explored the ethical issues of emerging ICTs. The paper goes beyond the description of technical innovation and its ethical consequences. The recognition of the ethical relevance of research and innovation has spawned a discourse around responsible research and innovation. The paper draws on this discourse, which aims at anticipatory technology governance to ensure the social acceptability and desirability of technologies. The prototype vignette of the paper explores how responsible research and innovation could be realised in practice and how it could be used to address ethical issues such as those of affective care robots. The paper reflects the likely controversies that responsible research and innovation is likely to create and it uses the ethical dilemma of the care robot to draw the reader's attention to possible theoretical and practical conclusions.

[1]  Roger Strand,et al.  Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch , 2011, Nanoethics.

[2]  Margunn Aanestad,et al.  Information Systems Innovation Research: Between Novel Futures and Durable Presents , 2011, Researching the Future in Information Systems.

[3]  Richard Owen,et al.  Environmental science: Good governance for geoengineering , 2011, Nature.

[4]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs , 2013 .

[6]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  The origins of the concept of ‘foresight’ in science and technology: An insider's perspective , 2010 .

[7]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[8]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  IT for a better future: how to integrate ethics, politics and innovation , 2011, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[9]  Paul Sollie,et al.  Evaluating new technologies : methodological problems for the ethical assessment of technology developments , 2009 .

[10]  B. Stahl.  Virtual suicide and other ethical issues of emerging information technologies , 2013 .

[11]  R. V. Schomberg.  Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2011 .

[12]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[13]  Richard Owen,et al.  Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  K. Leisinger.  Capitalism with a Human Face The UN Global Compact , 2007 .

[15]  R. V. Schomberg.  A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[16]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  The Need for a Value-Sensitive Design of Communication Infrastructures , 2009 .

[17]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[18]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Affective Computing: A Review , 2005, ACII.

[19]  P. Brey,et al.  Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[20]  K. Cuhls.  From forecasting to foresight processes—new participative foresight activities in Germany , 2003 .

[21]  Claire Marris,et al.  The Transnational Governance of Synthetic Biology: Scientific uncertainty, cross-borderness and the ‘art’ of governance. For the Royal Society Science Policy Centre (UK). , 2011 .

[22]  Catherine Flick,et al.  Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method , 2010, Int. J. Technoethics.

[23]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective Computing , 1997 .

[24]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective computing: challenges , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  D. Collingridge.  The social control of technology , 1980 .