Low-dose hyperradiosensitivity of human glioblastoma cell lines in vitro does not translate into improved outcome of ultrafractionated radiotherapy in vivo

Purpose: Low dose hyperradiosensitivity (HRS) has been observed in HGL21- and T98G human glioblastoma cells in vitro. The present study investigates whether these effects translate into improved outcome of ultrafractionated irradiation (UF) in vivo. Material and methods: T98G or HGL21 were transplanted on the hind leg of nude mice. Tumours were irradiated with UF (3 fractions of 0.4 Gy per day, interval 4 h, 7 days per week) or with conventional fractionation (CF; 1 fraction of 1.68 Gy per day, 5 days per week) over 2 or 4 weeks in HGL21 and 2,4 or 6 weeks in T98G. In HGL21, graded top-up doses under clamped hypoxia were applied after 4 weeks of fractionated irradiation. Additional groups of animals were irradiated with single doses under clamp hypoxic conditions with or without whole body irradiation (WBI) before tumour transplantation. Experimental endpoints were growth delay (time to 5-fold starting volume, GDV5) and local tumour control. Results: In T98G tumours median relative GDV5 was 1.2 [95%C.I. 0.96; ∞] in the CF and 0.8 [0.7; 1.02] in the UF arm (p = 0.009) indicating that ultrafractionation is less efficient than conventional fractionation. The TCD50 value of 33.5 Gy [22; 45] after UF was higher than TCD50 of 23.6 Gy [16; 31] after CF (p = 0.15). In HGL21 the median relative GDV5 was not significantly different between CF and UF. The top-up TCD50 value of 16.1 Gy [95% C.I. 9; 23 Gy] after CF was significantly lower than the corresponding value of 33.2 Gy [23; 44] after UF irradiation (p = 0.007), indicating a higher efficacy of CF compared to UF. Conclusion: The results on human T98G and HGL21 glioblastoma do not support the hypothesis that HRS in vitro translates into improved outcome of ultrafractionated irradiation in vivo.

[1]  Herman D. Suit,et al.  Radiation response of c3h mouse mammary carcinoma evaluated in terms of cellular radiation sensitivity. In texas, univ. Of, 18th ann. Symp. Fund. Cancer res., 1964. , 1965 .

[2]  A. Zietman,et al.  Multivariate determinants of radiocurability. I: Prediction of single fraction tumor control doses. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  S. Short,et al.  Low-dose hypersensitivity after fractionated low-dose irradiation in vitro. , 2001, International journal of radiation biology.

[4]  M. Baumann,et al.  Response of xenografts of human malignant gliomas and squamous cell carcinomas to fractionated irradiation. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M. Krause,et al.  Ultrafractionation in human malignant glioma xenografts , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[6]  P Lambin,et al.  Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  A. Taghian,et al.  In vitro intrinsic radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma multiforme. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Susan C Short,et al.  Low dose hyper-radiosensitivity in metastatic tumors. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M. Joiner Induced radioresistance: an overview and historical perspective. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[10]  M. Krause,et al.  Ultrafractionation in A7 human malignant glioma in nude mice , 2003, International journal of radiation biology.

[11]  A. Raz,et al.  Comparative effects of indomethacin on cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in tumor cells grown in vitro and in vivo. , 2001, Biochemical pharmacology.

[12]  Short Sc New methods to overcome radioresistance. , 2000 .

[13]  L. Milas,et al.  The proportion of stem cells in murine tumors. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  B. Marples,et al.  Effects of cell cycle phase on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. , 2003, International journal of radiation biology.

[15]  P. Lambin,et al.  Mégafractionnement: une méthode pour agir sur les tumeurs intrinsèquement radiorésistantes? , 1993 .

[16]  S. Linke,et al.  Human malignant glioma cell lines are sensitive to low radiation doses , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[17]  M. Baumann,et al.  Response of human squamous cell carcinoma xenografts of different sizes to irradiation: relationship of clonogenic cells, cellular radiation sensitivity in vivo, and tumor rescuing units. , 1990, Radiation research.

[18]  R. Kallman Rodent tumor models in experimental cancer therapy , 1987 .

[19]  M. Krause,et al.  Adjuvant inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor after fractionated irradiation of FaDu human squamous cell carcinoma. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  A. V. D. Kogel,et al.  Rodent tumor models in experimental cancer therapy , 1988 .

[21]  G. Steel,et al.  Basic Clinical Radiobiology , 1997 .

[22]  S A Mitchell,et al.  The response of human glioma cell lines to low-dose radiation exposure. , 1999, International journal of radiation biology.

[23]  B. Marples,et al.  The response of Chinese hamster V79 cells to low radiation doses: evidence of enhanced sensitivity of the whole cell population. , 1993, Radiation research.

[24]  T. Wiegel,et al.  Impact of overall treatment time of fractionated irradiation on local control of human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma in nude mice. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  E. Rofstad Local tumor control following single dose irradiation of human melanoma xenografts: relationship to cellular radiosensitivity and influence of an immune response by the athymic mouse. , 1989, Cancer research.

[26]  E. Rofstad Metastatic behavior of human tumors in congenitally athymic nude mice: Intrinsic properties of the tumor cells and host immune reactivity , 1995, International journal of cancer.