Harmonic Convergence Estimation Through Strain Energy Superconvergence

Grid convergence in finite element analysis, despite a wide variety of tools available to date, remains an elusive and challenging task. Due to the complex and time consuming process of remeshing and solving the finite element model (FEM), convergence studies can be part of the most arduous portion of the modeling process and can even be impossible with FEMs unassociated with CAD. Existing a posteriori methods, such as relative error in the energy norm, provide a near arbitrary indication of the model convergence for eigenfrequencies. This paper proposes a new approach to evaluate the harmonic convergence of an existing model without conducting a convergence study. Strain energy superconvergence takes advantage of superconvergence points within a FEM and accurately recovers the strain energy within the model using polyharmonic splines, thus providing a more accurate estimate of the system’s eigenfrequencies without modification of the FEM. Accurate eigenfrequencies are critical for designing for airfoil resonance avoidance and mistuned rotor response prediction. Traditional error estimation strategies fail to capture harmonic convergence as effectively as SES, potentially leading to a less accurate airfoil resonance and rotor mistuning prediction.Copyright © 2015 by ASME

[1]  R. Batra,et al.  Application of Zienkiewicz-Zhu's error estimate with superconvergent patch recovery to hierarchical p -refinement , 1999 .

[2]  R. Baušys ACCURACY ESTIMATES IN FREE VIBRATION ANALYSIS , 1995 .

[3]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Review of Discretization Error Estimators in Scientific Computing , 2010 .

[4]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  h andh-p version error estimation and adaptive procedures from theory to practice , 1989, Engineering with Computers.

[5]  Juan José Ródenas,et al.  Improvement of the superconvergent patch recovery technique by the use of constraint equations: the SPR‐C technique , 2007 .

[6]  Hendrik Schmidt,et al.  Discretization error when using finite element models: analysis and evaluation of an underestimated problem. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[8]  J. Barlow,et al.  Optimal stress locations in finite element models , 1976 .

[9]  Z. Yue,et al.  Rank deficiency in superconvergent patch recovery techniques with 4-node quadrilateral elements , 2006 .

[10]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Analysis of the Worst Mistuning Patterns in Bladed Disk Assemblies , 2003 .

[11]  R. Beatson,et al.  Fast evaluation of polyharmonic splines in three dimensions , 2006 .

[12]  Zhi Zong,et al.  A modified superconvergent patch recovery method and its application to large deformation problems , 2004 .

[13]  Bo Li,et al.  Analysis of a Class of Superconvergence Patch Recovery Techniques for Linear and Bilinear Finite Elements , 1999 .

[14]  J. Oden,et al.  A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .

[15]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The hierarchical concept in finite element analysis , 1983 .

[16]  Christophe Pierre,et al.  Using Intentional Mistuning in the Design of Turbomachinery Rotors , 2002 .

[17]  H. Kolsky,et al.  Dynamics of vibrations , 1965 .