Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology.

The Internet is now the single largest source of health information and is used by many patients and their families who are affected by childhood brain tumors. To assess the quality of pediatric neuro-oncology information on the Internet, we used search engines to look for information on five common tumor types (brain stem glioma, craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, low-grade glioma, and medulloblastoma). The Web sites were evaluated for content quality by using the validated DISCERN rating instrument. Breadth of content and its accuracy were also scored by a checklist tool. Readability statistics were computed on the highest-rated sites. Of 114 evaluated Web sites, the sources were as follows: institutional, 46%; commercial, 35%; charitable, 15%; support group, 2%; and alternative medicine, 2%. Good interobserver correlation was found for both ratings instruments. The DISCERN tool rated Web sites as excellent (4%), good (7%), fair (29%), poor (39%), or very poor (21%). Only 5% of the Web sites provided one or more inaccurate pieces of information. Web sites were found deficient in topics covering etiology, late effects, prognosis, and treatment choices. Few sites offered information in languages other than English, and readability statistics showed an average required reading level of U.S. grade 12+ (the suggested level being grades 6-8 for an adult audience). The Internet is increasingly being used as a source of oncology information for patients and their families. Health care professionals should be actively involved in developing high-quality information for use in the next generation of Web sites.

[1]  E. Bouffet,et al.  Chemotherapy for intracranial ependymomas , 1999, Child's Nervous System.

[2]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[3]  Petra Wilson,et al.  The quality of health information on the internet , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Jean M. Roberts,et al.  Clinical websites are currently dangerous to health , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  K. McPherson,et al.  Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  J Sybil Biermann,et al.  Melanoma information on the Internet: often incomplete--a public health opportunity? , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  D M D'Alessandro,et al.  The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. , 2001, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[8]  E. J. Mayeaux,et al.  Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[9]  M A Graber,et al.  Readability levels of patient education material on the World Wide Web. , 1999, The Journal of family practice.

[10]  P. Pizzo,et al.  Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology , 1989 .

[11]  R. Hayward.  The present and future management of childhood craniopharyngioma , 1999, Child's Nervous System.

[12]  C Durkin.  Accessing the Internet. New tools for researching cancer questions on the Internet. , 2000, National network.

[13]  S. Brewster,et al.  Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of Internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics , 2000, BJU international.

[14]  J. Saul,et al.  Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[16]  L. Edgar,et al.  Providing internet lessons to oncology patients and family members: a shared project , 2002, Psycho-oncology.

[17]  M. Carlsson.  Cancer patients seeking information from sources outside the health care system , 1999 .

[18]  J. Chin,et al.  Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. , 2001, Urology.

[19]  J. Biermann,et al.  Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet , 1999, Cancer.

[20]  Petra Wilson,et al.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Against internet exceptionalism , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  A. Gajjar,et al.  Chemotherapy of medulloblastoma , 1999, Child's Nervous System.

[23]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[24]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Quality Management, Certification and Rating of Health Information on the Net with MedCERTAIN: Using a medPICS/RDF/XML metadata structure for implementing eHealth ethics and creating trust globally , 2000, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  P. Symonds,et al.  Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views , 1996, BMJ.

[26]  R. Packer,et al.  Chemotherapy for low-grade gliomas , 1999, Child's Nervous System.

[27]  B. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Sources of information about cancer as perceived by adolescent patients, parents, and physicians. , 1981, Patient counselling and health education.

[28]  L. Siu,et al.  Impact of the media and the internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Jean Roberts.  Are healthcare professionals really prepared to deal with information-empowered citizens? , 1999, MIE.

[30]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  C. Freeman,et al.  Chemotherapy for brain stem gliomas , 1999, Child's Nervous System.

[32]  Paul Kim,et al.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review , 1999, BMJ.

[33]  M. Speece,et al.  Readability of Pediatric Patient Education Materials , 1995, Clinical pediatrics.

[34]  C. Daugherty,et al.  American oncologists' views of internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  Dirk Vordermark,et al.  The Internet as a Source of Medical Information Investigation in a Mixed Cohort of Radiotherapy Patients , 2000, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[36]  A. Jadad,et al.  Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. , 2002, JAMA.

[37]  P. Houts,et al.  Information needs of families of cancer patients: a literature review and recommendations. , 1991, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.