Computational protein design using flexible backbone remodeling and resurfacing: case studies in structure-based antigen design.

[1]  F M Richards,et al.  Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. II. Grafting of a buried transition metal binding site into Escherichia coli thioredoxin. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  F. Richards,et al.  Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. I. Computer-aided modeling of sites with pre-defined geometry. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Simon J. Hubbard,et al.  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology , 2006 .

[4]  I. Wilson,et al.  Antibody-antigen interactions , 1993 .

[5]  C Kooperberg,et al.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[7]  S L Mayo,et al.  Coupling backbone flexibility and amino acid sequence selection in protein design , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  P. S. Kim,et al.  High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.

[9]  J. Sodroski,et al.  Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody , 1998, Nature.

[10]  Stephen L. Mayo,et al.  Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[11]  M. Selmer,et al.  Crystal structure of Thermotoga maritima ribosome recycling factor: a tRNA mimic. , 1999, Science.

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  V. Rybin,et al.  Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[14]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  L. Looger,et al.  Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions , 2003, Nature.

[16]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[19]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[20]  Susumu Uchiyama,et al.  Structure and Binding Mode of a Ribosome Recycling Factor (RRF) from Mesophilic Bacterium* 210 , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Richard Bonneau,et al.  An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction , 2003, Proteins.

[22]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[23]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[24]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Computational Thermostabilization of an Enzyme , 2005, Science.

[25]  F. Schluenzen,et al.  X‐ray crystallography study on ribosome recycling: the mechanism of binding and action of RRF on the 50S ribosomal subunit , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[26]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity , 2006, Nature.

[27]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  David Baker,et al.  Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  David R. Liu,et al.  Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  P. Bradley,et al.  High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem , 2007, Nature.

[31]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  High-resolution design of a protein loop , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.

[33]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[34]  David Baker,et al.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[35]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Design of protein-interaction specificity affords selective bZIP-binding peptides , 2009, Nature.

[36]  Jasmine L. Gallaher,et al.  Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Structure‐based design of a T‐cell receptor leads to nearly 100‐fold improvement in binding affinity for pepMHC , 2009, Proteins.

[38]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Computational design of calmodulin mutants with up to 900-fold increase in binding specificity. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[40]  D. Baker,et al.  RosettaHoles: Rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  D. Baker,et al.  Elicitation of structure-specific antibodies by epitope scaffolds , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Mario Roederer,et al.  Rational Design of Envelope Identifies Broadly Neutralizing Human Monoclonal Antibodies to HIV-1 , 2010, Science.

[43]  L. Stamatatos,et al.  Computational design of epitope-scaffolds allows induction of antibodies specific for a poorly immunogenic HIV vaccine epitope. , 2010, Structure.