A stranger's touch : effects of accidental interpersonal touch on consumer evaluations and shopping time

This article examines an unexplored area of consumer research—the effect of accidental interpersonal touch (AIT) from a stranger on consumer evaluations and shopping times. The research presents a field experiment in a retail setting. This study shows that men and women who have been touched by another consumer when examining products report more negative brand evaluations, negative product beliefs, less willingness to pay, and spend less time in-store than their control (no-touch) counterparts. Our findings indicate that the AIT effect is especially negative for touch from a male stranger for both men (same-sex touch) and women (opposite-sex touch). Directions are provided for future study that highlight potential moderators and process explanations underlying the AIT effect.

[1]  T. Jones,et al.  Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: effects of culture, gender, and age. , 1995, The Journal of social psychology.

[2]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Physical Contact and Financial Risk Taking , 2010, Psychological science.

[3]  A. Fallon,et al.  A perspective on disgust. , 1987, Psychological review.

[4]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Gender Differences in Touch: An Empirical and Theoretical Review , 1984 .

[5]  C. Wetzel,et al.  The Midas Touch , 1984 .

[6]  Rui Zhu,et al.  Seeking Freedom through Variety , 2009 .

[7]  Michael Lynn,et al.  Reach out and touch your customers , 1998 .

[8]  R. Heslin,et al.  Meaning of touch: The case of touch from a stranger or same sex person , 1983 .

[9]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[10]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  More "touching" observations: New insights on men, women, and interpersonal touch. , 1990 .

[11]  E. Worthington,et al.  Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer; , 1984 .

[13]  N. Guéguen,et al.  The effect of touch on compliance with a restaurant's employee suggestion , 2007 .

[14]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  The effect of touch on tipping: an evaluation in a French bar , 2005 .

[15]  P. Greenbaum,et al.  Varieties of touching in greetings: Sequential structure and sex-related differences , 1980 .

[16]  J. Bargh,et al.  Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions , 2010, Science.

[17]  Jacob Hornik,et al.  Tactile Stimulation and Consumer Response , 1992 .

[18]  David E. Smith,et al.  Interpersonal Touch and Compliance with a Marketing Request , 1982 .

[19]  J. Lerner,et al.  Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice , 2000 .

[20]  H. Rosenfeld,et al.  Touch, Justification, and Sex: Influences on the Aversiveness of Spatial Violations. , 1978, The Journal of social psychology.

[21]  M. W. Lustig,et al.  Opposite sex touch avoidance: A national replication and extension , 1987 .

[22]  Brett A. S. Martin,et al.  Is the Marlboro man the only alternative? The role of gender identity and self-construal salience in evaluations of male models , 2009 .

[23]  Rosellina Ferraro,et al.  The Interplay among Category Characteristics, Customer Characteristics, and Customer Activities on in-Store Decision Making , 2009 .

[24]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others , 2006 .

[25]  Paco Underhill,et al.  Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping , 1999 .

[26]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[27]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2010 .

[28]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context , 2005 .

[29]  V. Derlega,et al.  Gender differences in the initiation and attribution of tactile intimacy , 1988 .

[30]  Gavan J. Fitzsimons,et al.  Product Contagion: Changing Consumer Evaluations through Physical Contact with “Disgusting” Products , 2007 .

[31]  G. Evans,et al.  Personal space. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[33]  R. Zweigenhaft,et al.  The effect on tipping of a waitress touching male and female customers. , 1986 .

[34]  K. Ohbuchi,et al.  Apology as aggression control: its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity , 2001 .

[36]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[37]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The "Need for Touch" Scale , 2003 .

[38]  B. Shiv.  Emotions, Decisions, and the Brain , 2007 .

[39]  G. Mandler.  Mind and Emotion , 1975 .

[40]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Target and Observer Differences in the Acceptance of Questionable Apologies , 2007 .

[41]  S. Thayer,et al.  History and strategies of research on social touch , 1986 .

[42]  Maureen Morrin,et al.  Does Touch Affect Taste? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues , 2008 .

[43]  J. Maltby,et al.  The reliability and validity of a susceptibility to embarrassment scale among adults , 2000 .

[44]  R. Fisk,et al.  The impact of other customers on service experiences: A critical incident examination of “getting along” , 1997 .

[45]  R. Heslin,et al.  Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. , 1976, Sociometry.

[46]  J. Peck,et al.  The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership , 2009 .

[47]  James M. Olson,et al.  Same-sex touching behavior: The moderating role of homophobic attitudes , 1992 .

[48]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  Tactile Contact and Evaluation of the Toucher , 2007, The Journal of social psychology.

[49]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  Microbes, mating, and morality: individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  C. A. Lowe,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Gender Differences in Inferring Sexual Interest , 2006 .

[51]  D. Holt,et al.  Man‐of‐Action Heroes: The Pursuit of Heroic Masculinity in Everyday Consumption , 2004 .

[52]  D. Ariely,et al.  Conceptual consumption. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[53]  N. Henley,et al.  Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication , 1977 .

[54]  J. Mahoney,et al.  The effect of waitresses' touch on alcohol consumption in dyads. , 1999, The Journal of social psychology.

[55]  Matthew J. Hertenstein,et al.  The Communicative Functions of Touch in Humans, Nonhuman Primates, and Rats: A Review and Synthesis of the Empirical Research , 2006, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[56]  J. Singer,et al.  Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. , 1962, Psychological review.

[57]  Michel Tuan Pham.  Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making , 1998 .

[58]  D. Doliński.  Touch, Compliance, and Homophobia , 2010 .

[59]  R. Thayer.  The biopsychology of mood and arousal , 1989 .

[60]  C. Spence,et al.  The science of interpersonal touch: An overview , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[61]  J. Hornik.  Effects of physical contact on customers' shopping time and behavior , 1992 .

[62]  Ken-ichi Ohbuchi,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Examination of the Effects of Apology and Perspective Taking on Forgiveness , 2001 .

[63]  D. Prelec,et al.  Always Leave Home Without It: A Further Investigation of the Credit-Card Effect on Willingness to Pay , 2001 .

[64]  Michael Lynn,et al.  REACH OUT AND TOUCH YOUR CUSTOMER , 2002 .

[65]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[66]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Degroot, Morris H. , 2006 .