The Human Rights Lawyer's Existential Dilemma
暂无分享,去创建一个
Professor David Kretzmer s "The Occupation of Justice " analyses 35 years of Israeli Supreme Court jurisprudence in cases relating to the Israeli domination over the Palestinian occupied lands. This comment is an attempt to dig out the implications concealed in the analysis for Israeli lawyers who fight against human rights abuses through legal challenges to IDF activity, and ponder whether this type of litigation is worthwhile. The author of this comment, a lawyer involved in much occupation-related litigation, presents one possible moral lesson gained by Kretzmer's analysis: that which portrays human rights lawyers as the (naive) supreme collaborators of the Israeli occupation.
[1] Y. Dotan. Judicial rhetoric, government lawyers, and human rights : The case of the Israeli High Court of Justice during the Intifada , 1999 .
[2] N. Bar-Yaacov. The Applicability of the Laws of War to Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) and to the Gaza Strip , 1990, Israel Law Review.
[3] R. Shamir. "Landmark Cases" and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel's High Court of Justice , 1990 .
[4] Y. Blum. The Missing Reversioner: Reflections on the Status of Judea and Samaria , 1968, Israel Law Review.