REANALYSIS IN ADULT HERITAGE LANGUAGE

This study presents and analyzes the comprehension of relative clauses in child and adult speakers of Russian, comparing monolingual controls with Russian heritage speakers (HSs) who are English-dominant. Monolingual and bilingual children demonstrate full adultlike mastery of relative clauses. Adult HSs, however, are significantly different from the monolingual adult controls and from the child HS group. This divergent performance indicates that the adult heritage grammar is not a product of the fossilization of child language. Instead, it suggests that forms existing in the baseline undergo gradual attrition over the life span of a HS. This result is consistent with observations on narrative structure in child and adult HSs (Polinsky, 2008b). Evidence from word order facts suggests that relative clause reanalysis in adult HSs cannot be attributed to transfer from English.

[1]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Toshiko Susuki Jinushi The structure of Japanese , 1963 .

[3]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Studies in Turkish Linguistics , 1986 .

[4]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods , 2004, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Helen Goodluck,et al.  Merge and binding in child relative clauses: the case of Irish , 2006, Journal of Linguistics.

[7]  David Caplan,et al.  Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of Syntactic Processing , 2000 .

[8]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[9]  Mitsuhiko Ota,et al.  Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2003 .

[10]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[11]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  G. Waters,et al.  Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[13]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Linguistic typology and theory construction: Common challenges ahead , 2007 .

[15]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[16]  Jason Rothman,et al.  Heritage speaker competence differences, language change, and input type: Inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese , 2007 .

[17]  Olga Kagan,et al.  Heritage language education : a new field emerging , 2008 .

[18]  Martin Kay,et al.  Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.

[19]  Inbal Arnon,et al.  Relative Clause Acquisition in Hebrew : Towards a Processing-Oriented Account , 2005 .

[20]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Gender under Incomplete Acquisition: Heritage Speakers' Knowledge of Noun Categorization. , 2008 .

[21]  Virginia Yip,et al.  RELATIVE CLAUSES IN CANTONESE-ENGLISH BILINGUAL CHILDREN: Typological Challenges and Processing Motivations , 2007, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[22]  Michiko Nakamura,et al.  Subject/Object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese , 2003 .

[23]  E. Keenan,et al.  Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[24]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Heritage Languages: In the 'Wild' and in the Classroom , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[25]  Roumyana Slabakova,et al.  Meaning in the second language , 2008 .

[26]  Maurice I. Levin,et al.  Russian learners' dictionary : 10,000 words in frequency order , 1997 .

[27]  Evelina Fedorenko,et al.  The syntactic complexity of Russian relative clauses , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[28]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .

[29]  Nayoung Kwon,et al.  Processing of syntactic and anaphoric gap-filler dependencies in Korean : evidence from self-paced reading time, ERP and eye-tracking experiments , 2008 .

[30]  Tomasello,et al.  The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech , 2001 .

[31]  Yassir Tjung,et al.  The formation of relative clauses in Jakarta Indonesian : a subject-object asymmetry , 2006 .

[32]  Michael T. Wescoat,et al.  Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 1983 .

[33]  Florian Schwarz,et al.  Processing Presupposed Content , 2007, J. Semant..

[34]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[35]  S. Montrul Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor , 2008 .

[36]  S. Montrul Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence , 2004, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[37]  Tracy Holloway King Configuring topic and focus in Russian , 1995 .

[38]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Processing of Locally Ambiguous Relative Clauses in German , 1995 .

[39]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian , 1988, Cognition.

[40]  Nayoung Kwon,et al.  Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting subject/object asymmetry: An eye-tracking study of prenominal relative clauses in Korean , 2010 .

[41]  A. Zukowski,et al.  Young children’s production of head-final relative clauses: Elicited production data from Chinese children , 2009 .

[42]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Heritage Language Narratives , 2008 .

[43]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Comprehension and production of movement-derived sentences by Russian speakers with agrammatic aphasia , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[44]  Virginia Yip,et al.  The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact , 2007 .

[45]  Dong-Bo Hsu,et al.  The syllable in Old Chinese: sub-syllabic processes, syllable structure, and the status of medial glides , 2009 .

[46]  David Swinney,et al.  Language and the brain : representation and processing , 2000 .

[47]  S. Montrul On the bilingual competence of Spanish heritage speakers: Syntax, lexical-semantics and processing , 2006 .

[48]  Helen Goodluck,et al.  The Structure and Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Serbo-Croatian , 1996 .

[49]  S. Montrul Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals , 2002, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[50]  G. Waters,et al.  Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event‐related fMRI study of relative clauses , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[51]  D. Slobin The acquisition and use of Relative Clauses in Turkic and Indo-European Languages , 1986 .

[52]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  Relative clause formation in Romance child's production , 2003 .

[53]  M. Polinsky Incomplete Acquisition American Russian , 2006 .

[54]  S. Kuczaj,et al.  Language Development, I: Syntax and Semantics , 1983 .

[55]  David Caplan,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[56]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[57]  A. McCabe Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[58]  Carmen Silva-Corvalán Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles , 1996 .

[59]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2002 .

[60]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Subject preference in Korean , 2006 .

[61]  John Frederick Bailyn,et al.  Generalized Inversion , 2004 .