Simulation of the Sorption-Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Process Operated in Fluidized Bed Reactors: A Dynamic One-Dimensional Two-Fluid Model

The aim of the study described in this paper is to derive a fluidised bed reactor model that improve the description of the reactor performance relative to the KuniiLevenspiel type of models frequently used in chemical reactor engineering. The classical SIMPLE algorithm is extended to compressible multiphase reactive flows. The suggested one-dimensional Eulerian–Eulerian two-fluid model is applied to investigate the reactive gas–solid flows of the SE-SMR processes. Whereas the Kunii-Levenspiel models generally assumes a prescribed solid flux within the fluidised bed reactors, the two-fluid model derived in this study serves as highly relevant in the progress of commercial reactors for processes such as the novel SE-SMR technology because the solid flux incorporated in the two-fluid model allows for dynamic modeling of interconnected fluidized bed reactors. Moreover, the twoand three dimensional two-fluid models are yet too computational demanding due to the complexity of the gas–solid flow in the bed. Hence, these models are not efficient for studies of the processes such as the SE-SMR technology where the solid particles are transferred between reactor units for utilization and recover of the characteristic solid property, i.e. CO 2 -capture and CO 2 -release.

[1]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[2]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  Chemical Reactor Modeling: Multiphase Reactive Flows , 2008 .

[3]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  3D Simulation of bubbling fluidized bed reactors for sorption enhanced steam methane reforming processes , 2010 .

[4]  Maria Fernandino,et al.  Derivation and validation of a binary multi-fluid Eulerian model for fluidized beds , 2011 .

[5]  Chia-Jung Hsu Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 1981 .

[6]  Mathematical modelling of low-temperature hydrogen production with in situ CO2 capture , 2007 .

[7]  C. Wen Mechanics of Fluidization , 1966 .

[8]  D. Jeffrey,et al.  Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Sorption Enhanced Steam Methane Reforming Process Performance and Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor Design Analysis by Use of a Two-Fluid Model , 2009 .

[10]  H. Jakobsen,et al.  Practical validation of the two-fluid model applied to dense gas-solid flows in fluidized beds , 2007 .

[11]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Determination of intrinsic rate constants of the CaO–CO2 reaction , 2008 .

[12]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[13]  De Chen,et al.  SE-SMR process performance in CFB reactors: Simulation of the CO2 adsorption/desorption processes with CaO based sorbents , 2011 .

[14]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  Numerical study of hydrogen production by the sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process with online CO2 capture as operated in fluidized bed reactors , 2011 .

[15]  D. Gidaspow Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions , 1994 .

[16]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  A Sensitivity Study of the Two-Fluid Model Closure Parameters (β, e) Determining the Main Gas−Solid Flow Pattern Characteristics , 2010 .

[17]  K. Kobe The properties of gases and liquids , 1959 .

[18]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Computational methods for fluid dynamics , 1996 .