Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments.

OBJECTIVES Although hearing protectors must be used as a temporary solution, their choice should take into account several aspects, such as ergonomic features, associated with this device. The present study aims to analyse the relationship between the acoustical attenuation efficiency and other aspects related to the comfort afforded by hearing protectors and, consequently, their acceptability when used in industrial noisy environments. METHODS An evaluation of comfort was performed using a questionnaire, completed by 20 workers. Several scales related to the subjective feeling of comfort were used to quantify the comfort index of a given protector. Simultaneously, the time of usage of each protector was self-recorded by each subject. To test the relationship between the comfort index and the time during which protectors were used, a two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was applied. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The results obtained seem to demonstrate that there are significant differences between catalogued and effective attenuation. Protectors with less catalogued attenuation, but with higher acceptability, i.e. which were more comfortable, tended to be more efficient than protectors with a higher catalogued attenuation, but which were less comfortable. Finally, it must be emphasized that high efficiency can only be achieved through the attainment of an adequate balance between the range of parameters likely to determine its usage.

[1]  A Mayer,et al.  Assessment of the protection efficiency and comfort of personal protective equipment in real conditions of use. , 1999, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[2]  R. D. Ray,et al.  Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II , 1985 .

[3]  Sally Lechlitner Lusk,et al.  Predictors of Hearing Protection Use among Workers: Implications for Training Programs , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Pedro Arezes,et al.  Efficiency vs. acceptability of hearing protectors in industrial environments , 2001 .

[5]  A. Sérgio Miguel Personal hearing protection , 1996 .

[6]  Donald C. Gasaway Personal Hearing Protection in Industry, edited by P. W. Alberti , 1983 .

[7]  P M Rabinowitz,et al.  Is acculturation related to use of hearing protection? , 2001, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[8]  Peter W. Alberti Personal hearing protection in industry , 1982 .

[9]  T. L. Davies,et al.  EDUCATION FOR HEALTH , 1944 .

[10]  Sally Lechlitner Lusk,et al.  Effectiveness of an Intervention to Increase Construction Workers' Use of Hearing Protection , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[11]  M J Kerr,et al.  Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  R. Neitzel,et al.  Noise exposure among construction electricians. , 2001, AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[13]  D. Ronis,et al.  Test of the Health Promotion Model as a Causal Model of Workers' Use of Hearing Protection , 1994, Nursing research.

[14]  Lewis R. Aiken,et al.  Rating Scales and Checklists: Evaluating Behavior, Personality, and Attitudes , 1996 .

[15]  ELLIOTT H. BERGER The Performance of Hearing Protectors in Industrial Noise Environments , 2000 .

[16]  Hearing Protector Performance: How They Work-and-What Goes Wrong in the Real World , 2000 .

[17]  Min-Yong Park,et al.  An empirical study of comfort afforded by various hearing protection devices: Laboratory versus field results , 1991 .