Learner control, user characteristics, platform difference, and their role in adoption intention for MOOC learning in China

Massive open online course (MOOC) learning attracts more and more attention in both the practice and the research field. Finding out what factors influence learners’ MOOC adoption is of great importance. This study focuses on learner control, user characteristics and platform difference. Hypotheses and a research model are proposed by incorporating perceived learner control, e-learning self-efficacy, and personal innovativeness in information technology (PIIT) into the original technology acceptance model (TAM). With the empirical data from 214 MOOC learners, the effects of perceived learner control on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are confirmed. E-Learning self-efficacy is found to have positive influence on perceived learner control and ease of use. While the effect of PIIT on perceived learner control is not supported, PIIT influences learners’ perception of usefulness and ease of use. Furthermore, a comparison between foreign and native MOOC platforms shows the former should emphasize ease of use more, and the latter should emphasize usefulness more, to enhance their attractiveness.

[1]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Research Note - How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco,et al.  Users' intrinsic and extrinsic drivers to use a web-based educational environment , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Matthew K. Burns,et al.  Updated Meta-Analysis of Learner Control Within Educational Technology , 2014 .

[5]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[6]  K. Scheiter,et al.  Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments , 2007 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[8]  Donatella Persico,et al.  Adapting the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Li Yuan,et al.  MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education , 2013 .

[10]  Ángel Francisco Agudo-Peregrina,et al.  Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Michael E. Wasserman,et al.  E-nabled for E-Learning? The Moderating Role of Personality in Determining the Optimal Degree of Learner Control in an E-Learning Environment , 2010 .

[12]  June Lu,et al.  Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Tara S. Behrend,et al.  Using Animated Agents in Learner‐Controlled Training: The Effects of Design Control , 2012 .

[14]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[15]  Huey-Min Sun,et al.  Effects of User and System Characteristics on Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use of the Web-Based Classroom Response System , 2012 .

[16]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[17]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Yukun Bao,et al.  Can Online MBA Programmes Allow Professional Working Mothers to Balance Work, Family, and Career Progression? A Case Study in China , 2014, ArXiv.

[19]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Jo Morrison,et al.  Harnessing Technology Schools Survey 2009: data report – part 1, descriptive analysis , 2009 .

[21]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .

[23]  Leo R. Vijayasarathy,et al.  Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Lauren N. Harkrider,et al.  Learner-controlled practice difficulty in the training of a complex task: cognitive and motivational mechanisms. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  Michael E. Wasserman,et al.  Power to the people: using learner control to improve trainee reactions and learning in web-based instructional environments. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[28]  George Siemens,et al.  Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative , 2014 .

[29]  M. Välimäki,et al.  Impact of e-learning on nurses' and student nurses knowledge, skills, and satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, International journal of nursing studies.

[30]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Understanding e‐Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Learner Control versus Program Control in Interactive Videodisc Instruction: What Are the Effects in Procedural Learning?. , 1992 .

[32]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy , 2002, MIS Q..

[33]  Kurt Kraiger,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of learner control: Old findings and new directions. , 2007 .

[34]  Michael E. Wasserman,et al.  Trainee Reactions to Learner Control: An Important Link in the E-Learning Equation , 2010 .

[35]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[36]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Effectiveness of Fully Online Courses for College Students: Response to a Department of Education Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[37]  Hedieh Najafi,et al.  A Comparison of Learner Intent and Behaviour in Live and Archived MOOCs. , 2014 .

[38]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[39]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[40]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  Bing Wu,et al.  Empirical study on continuance intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 systems , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[42]  D. Funder,et al.  Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness ☆ , 2007 .

[43]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[44]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[45]  Marjan Hericko,et al.  A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Timothy Teo,et al.  PRESERVICE TEACHERS' SATISFACTION WITH E-LEARNING , 2014 .

[48]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  Exploring the antecedents of collaborative learning performance over social networking sites in a ubiquitous learning context , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[50]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  Tao Chan,et al.  Exploring the intention to use a clinical imaging portal for enhancing healthcare education. , 2013, Nurse education today.

[52]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[53]  M. Merrill.  Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions , 1975 .

[54]  Garry Wei-Han Tan,et al.  Intention to Use Mobile Learning Survey , 2014 .

[55]  Shanna Smith Jaggars,et al.  Adaptability to Online Learning: Differences across Types of Students and Academic Subject Areas. CCRC Working Paper No. 54. , 2013 .

[56]  Anatália Saraiva Martins Ramos,et al.  Satisfaction and continuous use intention of e-learning service in Brazilian public organizations , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Localization of Web design: An empirical comparison of German, Japanese, and United States Web site characteristics , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[58]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective , 2010 .

[59]  Yung-Ming） 程永明（Cheng,et al.  What Drives Nurses' Blended e-Learning Continuance Intention?. , 2014 .

[60]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Pseudoscience in Computer-Based Instruction: The Case of Learner Control Research. , 1993 .

[61]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[62]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  System, scholar or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? , 2014, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[63]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Dispositional Factors in Internet Use: Personality Versus Cognitive Style , 2007, MIS Q..

[64]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[65]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..