Imaging and force-distance analysis of human fibroblasts in vitro by atomic force microscopy.

The structure of human fibroblasts have been characterised in vitro by atomic force microscopy (AFM) operated in the imaging or in the force versus distance (F-d) modes. The choice of cell substrate is important to ensure good adhesion. Of greater significance in the context of AFM analysis, is the observation that the substrate affects the imaging conditions for in vitro analysis of live cells. For instance, very rarely will glass coverslips lead to acceptable outcomes (i.e., resolved cytoskeletal structure). Activated tissue culture dishes, on the other hand, promote conditions that routinely result in good quality images. Those conditions are then unaffected by adoption of relatively high force loadings (more than 10 nN), large fields of view (100 x 100 microm2) and high scan speeds (up to ca. 200 microm/sec), all of which exceed values recommended in the literature. Plasma membranes are fragile in the context of AFM analysis (F-d analysis gives an equivalent Young's Modulus of ca. 5 kPa). However, the present work suggests that fragility per se need not be a problem, rather it is the adhesive interactions with the tip, which under some circumstances may exceed 20 nN, that are the source of poor imaging conditions. The present results, being supported by a qualitative model, suggest that the activated substrate acts as a preferential scavenger of cellular debris thus preventing the tip from biofouling, and will therefore promote low adhesion between tip and membrane. Good imaging conditions provide non-destructive in vitro information about cytoskeletal structure and dynamics, as shown in two examples concerned with cytochalasin treatment and with the MTT assay.

[1]  J. Hoh,et al.  Slow cellular dynamics in MDCK and R5 cells monitored by time-lapse atomic force microscopy. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Filip Braet,et al.  Noncontact versus contact imaging: An atomic force microscopic study on hepatic endothelial cells in vitro , 1997 .

[3]  D. Keller,et al.  Cytoskeleton of living, unstained cells imaged by scanning force microscopy. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Chris Van Haesendonck,et al.  Can atomic force microscopy tips be inspected by atomic force microscopy , 1991 .

[5]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  From atoms to integrated circuit chips, blood cells, and bacteria with the atomic force microscope , 1990 .

[6]  C. le Grimellec,et al.  Imaging of the surface of living cells by low-force contact-mode atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[7]  A J Malkin,et al.  Atomic force microscopy studies of living cells: visualization of motility, division, aggregation, transformation, and apoptosis. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[8]  R. Guckenberger,et al.  Atomic-force microscopy on the olfactory dendrites of the silkmoths Antheraea polyphemus and A. pernyi , 1998, Cell and Tissue Research.

[9]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[10]  E Finot,et al.  Simultaneous imaging of the surface and the submembraneous cytoskeleton in living cells by tapping mode atomic force microscopy. , 1997, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[11]  Y. Yamane,et al.  Comparative Atomic Force and Scanning Electron Microscopy for Fine Structural Images of Nerve Cells , 1998 .

[12]  Weyn,et al.  Atomic force microscopy: influence of air drying and fixation on the morphology and viscoelasticity of cultured cells , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  P K Hansma,et al.  Imaging real-time neurite outgrowth and cytoskeletal reorganization with an atomic force microscope. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  Z. Shao,et al.  Biological atomic force microscopy: what is achieved and what is needed , 1996 .

[15]  Sverre Myhra,et al.  Imaging and nano‐dissection of tobacco mosaic virus by atomic force microscopy , 1995 .

[16]  J. Dvorak,et al.  Kinetic analysis of the mitotic cycle of living vertebrate cells by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Experimental cell research.

[17]  E. Nagao,et al.  An integrated approach to the study of living cells by atomic force microscopy , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[18]  S. Kasas,et al.  Observation of living cells using the atomic force microscope. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[19]  T M Jovin,et al.  Imaging subcellular structures of rat mammary carcinoma cells by scanning force microscopy. , 1994, Journal of cell science.

[20]  Sverre Myhra,et al.  Determination of the spring constants of probes for force microscopy/spectroscopy , 1996 .

[21]  P. Haydon,et al.  Actin filament dynamics in living glial cells imaged by atomic force microscopy. , 1992, Science.

[22]  Kazuhiro Abe,et al.  Fine Surface Images That Reflect Cytoskeletal Structures in Cultured Glial Cells by Atomic Force Microscopy , 1998 .

[23]  R. Lal,et al.  Shear stress-induced reorganization of the surface topography of living endothelial cells imaged by atomic force microscopy. , 1994, Circulation research.

[24]  Hermann E. Gaub,et al.  Adhesive forces between ligand and receptor measured by AFM , 1994 .

[25]  Braet,et al.  Imaging surface and submembranous structures with the atomic force microscope: a study on living cancer cells, fibroblasts and macrophages , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[26]  J. Hoh,et al.  Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy , 1996 .

[27]  M Grattarola,et al.  Mechanical and morphological properties of living 3T6 cells probed via scanning force microscopy , 1997, Microscopy research and technique.

[28]  V. Moy,et al.  Mechanical properties of L929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. , 2006, Scanning.

[29]  M. Grattarola,et al.  Scanning force microscopy on live cultured cells: Imaging and force‐versus‐distance investigations , 1994, Journal of microscopy.

[30]  D. F. Evans,et al.  Lateral Force Microscopy Study on the Shear Properties of Self-Assembled Monolayers of Dialkylammonium Surfactant on Mica , 1994 .

[31]  P K Hansma,et al.  Atomic force microscopy for high-resolution imaging in cell biology. , 1992, Trends in cell biology.

[32]  Sandor Kasas,et al.  Deformation and height anomaly of soft surfaces studied with an AFM , 1993 .

[33]  M. Arnsdorf,et al.  Atomic (Scanning) Force Microscopy in Cardiovascular Research , 1996, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[34]  V. Parpura,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of living neurons and glia with the atomic force microscope. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[35]  M Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the elastic properties of biological samples with the AFM. , 1997, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[36]  H. Haga,et al.  Elastic properties of living fibroblasts as imaged using force modulation mode in atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Archives of histology and cytology.

[37]  B. V. Derjaguin,et al.  Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles , 1975 .

[38]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Functional Group Imaging by Chemical Force Microscopy , 1994, Science.

[39]  V. Parpura,et al.  Membrane deformation of living glial cells using atomic force microscopy , 1996, Journal of microscopy.

[40]  G. Watson,et al.  Lateral force microscopy — a quantitative approach , 1997 .