Flower tracking in hawkmoths: behavior and energetics

SUMMARY As hovering feeders, hawkmoths cope with flower motions by tracking those motions to maintain contact with the nectary. This study examined the tracking, feeding and energetic performance of Manduca sexta feeding from flowers moving at varied frequencies and in different directions. In general we found that tracking performance decreased as frequency increased; M. sexta tracked flowers moving at 1 Hz best. While feeding rates were highest for stationary flowers, they remained relatively constant for all tested frequencies of flower motion. Calculations of net energy gain showed that energy expenditure to track flowers is minimal compared to energy intake; therefore, patterns of net energy gain mimicked patterns of feeding rate. The direction effects of flower motion were greater than the frequency effects. While M. sexta appeared equally capable of tracking flowers moving in the horizontal and vertical motion axes, they demonstrated poor ability to track flowers moving in the looming axis. Additionally, both feeding rates and net energy gain were lower for looming axis flower motions.

[1]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of motion detectors matched to low image velocities in hovering insects , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  C. Hill,et al.  The effect of adult diet on the biology of butterflies , 1989, Oecologia.

[3]  T. Daniel,et al.  On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  R. Marquis,et al.  FITNESS IMPACTS OF HERBIVORY THROUGH INDIRECT EFFECTS ON PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS IN OENOTHERA MACROCARPA , 2000 .

[5]  J C Stout,et al.  Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set , 1998, Oecologia.

[6]  A. Ippolito,et al.  POLLINATOR PREFERENCES FOR NICOTIANA ALATA, N. FORGETIANA, AND THEIR F1 HYBRIDS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  D. Varjú,et al.  Visual position stabilization in the hummingbird hawk moth, Macroglossum stellatarum L. I. Behavioural analysis , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  Richard H. White,et al.  The retina of Manduca sexta: rhodopsin expression, the mosaic of green-, blue- and UV-sensitive photoreceptors, and regional specialization , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  W. Farina,et al.  Nectar feeding by the hovering hawk moth Macroglossum stellatarum: intake rate as a function of viscosity and concentration of sucrose solutions , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Bartsch,et al.  Physiological optics in the hummingbird hawkmoth: a compound eye without ommatidia , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  T. Yahara,et al.  Why does the flower of Lonicera japonica open at dusk , 1998 .

[12]  Rainee L. Kaczorowski,et al.  Nectar traits in Nicotiana section Alatae (Solanaceae) in relation to floral traits, pollinators, and mating system. , 2005, American journal of botany.

[13]  Nathaniel P. Jacobson,et al.  Induced airflow in flying insects II. Measurement of induced flow , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  C. Ellington.  The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. VI. Lift and Power Requirements , 1984 .

[15]  R. Kern,et al.  Visual position stabilization in the hummingbird hawk moth, Macroglossum stellatarum L. II. Electrophysiological analysis of neurons sensitive to wide-field image motion , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  A. Kelber.  Sugar preferences and feeding strategies in the hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  D. Varjú,et al.  The regulation of distance to dummy flowers during hovering flight in the hawk moth Macroglossum stellatarum , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[18]  D. Schemske,et al.  Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Willis,et al.  Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths, Manduca sexta , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  J. Goyret,et al.  The role of mechanosensory input in flower handling efficiency and learning by Manduca sexta , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naı̈ve hawkmoths, Manduca sexta , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  C. Boggs,et al.  Renewable and nonrenewable resources: Amino acid turnover and allocation to reproduction in Lepidoptera , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  K. Weiss.  Vibration Problems in Engineering , 1965, Nature.

[25]  S A Etnier,et al.  Reorientation of daffodil(Narcissus: Amaryllidaceae) flowers inwind: drag reduction andtorsional flexibility. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[26]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Effects of Vibration on Mechanical Properties and Biomass Allocation Pattern ofCapsella bursa-pastoris(Cruciferae) , 1998 .

[27]  H. Krenn.  Functional morphology and movements of the proboscis of Lepidoptera (Insecta) , 1990, Zoomorphology.

[28]  R. Raguso,et al.  Trumpet Flowers of the Sonoran Desert: Floral Biology of Peniocereus Cacti and Sacred Datura , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.