The neural representation of language in users of American Sign Language.

UNLABELLED Studies of American Sign Language (ASL) offer unique insights into the fundamental properties of human language. Neurolinguistic studies explore the effects of left and right hemisphere lesions on the production and comprehension of signed language. Following damage to the left hemisphere perisylvian regions, signers, like users of spoken languages, exhibit frank aphasic disturbances. Sign language paraphasia illustrates the linguistic specificity of impairment. A case study involving cortical stimulation mapping (CSM) in a deaf signer provides evidence for the specialization of Broca's area in sign language production. The effects of right hemisphere damage highlight the specialized properties of sign language use. Data from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of deaf signers confirm the importance of left hemisphere language structures in the use of signed language, but also reveal the contributions of right hemisphere regions to the processing of ASL. These studies provide new insights into the complementary roles of biology and environment in language representation in the human brain. LEARNING OUTCOMES As a result of this activity, the participant will read studies of aphasia in users of signed language and a discussion of neurolinguistic studies of paraphasia in ASL. The participant will examine the role of the right hemisphere in language use and findings from a functional imaging study of sentence processing in ASL and English.

[1]  W. Sandler,et al.  On the nature of phonological structure in sign language , 1993, Phonology.

[2]  R. Battison,et al.  Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language , 1978 .

[3]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Dissociation between linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural systems: A case for compositionality , 1992, Brain and Language.

[4]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Processing a dynamic visual—Spatial language: Psycholinguistic studies of American Sign Language , 1993, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[5]  Howard Poizner,et al.  Neural basis of language and motor behaviour: Perspectives from American Sign Language , 1992 .

[6]  P. B. Braem.  Acquisition of the Handshape in American Sign Language: A Preliminary Analysis , 1990 .

[7]  Cecile McKee.  The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (review) , 2001 .

[8]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  S E Petersen,et al.  A positron emission tomography study of the short-term maintenance of verbal information , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Virginia Volterra,et al.  From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children , 1990 .

[11]  Charles Warlow.  Handbook of Neurology , 1991 .

[12]  J. Risberg,et al.  Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in Sign Language Users , 1993, Brain and Language.

[13]  Marina L. McIntire.  The Acquisition of American Sign Language Hand Configurations , 2013 .

[14]  Patrick Coppens,et al.  Aphasia in atypical populations , 2000 .

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of thinking in sign language , 1997, Neuroreport.

[16]  Visual language processing and unilateral neglect: Evidence from American sign language , 1996 .

[17]  D. Brentari,et al.  Aphasic and Parkinsonian Signing: Differences in Phonological Disruption , 1995, Brain and Language.

[18]  L C Robertson,et al.  The breakdown and rehabilitation of visuospatial dysfunction in brain-injured patients. , 1983, International rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  U. Bellugi,et al.  What the hands reveal about the brain , 1987 .

[20]  S. Blumstein.  A Phonological Investigation of Aphasic Speech , 1973 .

[21]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  The neurobiology of sign language and its implications for the neural basis of language , 1996, Nature.

[22]  H. Gardner,et al.  The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks , 1990, Brain and Language.

[23]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Storage and Rehearsal in Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Positron Emission Tomography , 1996 .

[24]  E. Newport,et al.  Out of the hands of babes: On a possible sign advantage in language acquisition , 1990 .

[25]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients , 1992, Brain and Language.

[26]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[27]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Language, Gesture, and Space. , 1996 .

[28]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[29]  R. P. Meier,et al.  Language Acquisition by Deaf Children , 1991 .

[30]  Kevin P. Hinshaw,et al.  Functional Roles of Broca's Area and SMG: Evidence from Cortical Stimulation Mapping in a Deaf Signer , 1999, NeuroImage.

[31]  D Bavelier,et al.  Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.