Product Market Characteristics and the Industry Life Cycle v1r10

A theoretical model implies that technological opportunity drives industry evolution, fueling a spiral of advantage that allows a few firms to dominate in the long run in high technological opportunity markets. Distinctive implications are tested using new long-period, cross-sectional, cross-national (US and UK) industry data on narrowly-defined product markets. The process by which industries evolve to their static outcomes is found to occur similarly for the same industry in the different countries. Some industries have strong shakeouts in firm numbers and others not, confirming findings of Gort and Klepper (1982) on the first large set of alternative data. In industries with shakeouts entry eventually nearly ceases, but in industries without shakeouts entry remains high. Even in strong shakeouts there is not necessarily a rise in firms’ rate of exit coincident with the shakeout, confirming that shakeouts are not driven by single technological events. The theory and evidence explain why early mover advantage is tied up with the spiral of firm advantage that yields shakeouts, so that only in industries with substantial shakeouts do early movers experience low exit rates relative to incumbents. Technological patterns conform to those expected if technological opportunity drives typical industry outcomes. Leading early entrants dominate relevant patents in industries with substantial shakeouts, and patenting enhances survival especially in industries with shakeouts. Thus technological innovation seems typically to drive alternative industry competitive dynamics, through a spiral of firm advantage in industries with high opportunity for product improvement and process innovation.

[1]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[2]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[3]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Forces Generating and Limiting Concentration under Schumpeterian Competition , 1978 .

[4]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U. S. , 2000 .

[5]  John Sutton,et al.  Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History , 1998 .

[6]  John Sutton,et al.  Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration , 1992 .

[7]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[8]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[9]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation, Competition, and Industry Structure , 1993 .

[10]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Inter-industry studies of structure and performance , 1987 .

[11]  E. Rasmusen,et al.  The Learning Curve in a Competitive Industry , 1997 .

[12]  Gerhard Rosegger,et al.  International Differences in Industrial Structure , 1967 .

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[14]  José Carlos Fariñas García Sunk costs and market structure: price competition, advertising and the evolution of concentration , 1993 .

[15]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity , 1980 .

[16]  M. Flaherty,et al.  Industry Structure and Cost-Reducing Investment , 1980 .

[17]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[18]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  The Life Cycle of a Competitive Industry , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Kenneth L. Simons On the Theory of Product Market Characteristics and the Industry Life Cycle , 2006 .

[21]  E. Mansfield Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[22]  R. Feenstra U.S. Imports, 1972-1994: Data and Concordances , 1996 .

[23]  R. V. Wyk Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[24]  M. Wand Local Regression and Likelihood , 2001 .

[25]  A. McGahan,et al.  How does innovative activity change as industries mature , 2001 .

[26]  E. Arnold Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry: An Empirical Evaluation of Theories of the Firm , 1985 .

[27]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[28]  E. McDonough Managing imitation strategies: How later entrants seize markets from pioneers , 1995 .

[29]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Firm Survival and the Evolution of Oligopoly , 2002 .

[30]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[31]  Frederic L. Pryor An International Comparison of Concentration Ratios , 1972 .

[32]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network , 1995 .

[33]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure , 1990 .

[34]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[35]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[36]  Rajshree Agarwal,et al.  Evolutionary trends of industry variables , 1998 .

[37]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Industry shakeouts and technological change , 2005 .

[38]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Making of an Oligopoly: Firm Survival and Technological Change in the Evolution of the U.S. Tire Industry , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[40]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[41]  John Sutton,et al.  Product differentiation and industrial structure , 1985 .

[42]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Entry, exit, and shakeouts in the United States in new manufactured products , 1995 .

[43]  Anirban DasGupta Maximum Likelihood Estimates , 2008 .

[44]  Edwin R. Otto Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage , 1986 .

[45]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach , 1999 .

[46]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Technological Extinctions of Industrial Firms: An Inquiry into Their Nature and Causes , 1997 .

[47]  Guohua Pan,et al.  Local Regression and Likelihood , 1999, Technometrics.