Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.

The scalp-recorded frequency following response (FFR) in humans was measured for a 244-Hz pure tone at a range of input levels and for complex tones containing harmonics 2-4 of a 300-Hz fundamental, but shifted by ±56 Hz. The effective magnitude of the cubic difference tone (CDT) and the quadratic difference tone (QDT, at F(2)-F(1)) in the FFR for the complex was estimated by comparing the magnitude spectrum of the FFR at the distortion product (DP) frequency with that for the pure tone. The effective DP levels in the FFR were higher than those commonly estimated in psychophysical experiments, indicating contributions to the DP in the FFR in addition to the audible propagated component. A low-frequency narrowband noise masker reduced the magnitude of FFR responses to the CDT but also to primary components over a wide range of frequencies. The results indicate that audible DPs may contribute very little to the DPs observed in the FFR and that using a narrowband noise for the purpose of masking audible DPs can have undesired effects on the FFR over a wide frequency range. The results are consistent with the notion that broadly tuned mechanisms central to the auditory nerve strongly influence the FFR.

[1]  I. Winter,et al.  Temporal representation of iterated rippled noise as a function of delay and sound level in the ventral cochlear nucleus. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Shaum P Bhagat,et al.  Evaluation of distortion products produced by the human auditory system , 2003, Hearing Research.

[3]  J M Festen,et al.  Phase effects in a three-component signal. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Thomas Baer,et al.  A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness , 1997 .

[5]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Human Frequency-Following Responses to Two-Tone Approximations of Steady-State Vowels , 1999, Audiology and Neurotology.

[6]  T. Dau.  The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  I. W. Mair,et al.  Frequency-following responses in the cat , 1984, Hearing Research.

[8]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Subcortical Plasticity Following Perceptual Learning in a Pitch Discrimination Task , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[9]  T. Houtgast.  Auditory-filter characteristics derived from direct-masking data and pulsation-threshold data with a rippled-noise masker. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E M Glaser,et al.  The human frequency-following response: its behavior during continuous tone and tone burst stimulation. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Combination Tones and Their Origin , 1972 .

[12]  P. Osterhammel,et al.  The frequency selectivity of the 500 HZ frequency following response. , 1977, Scandinavian audiology.

[13]  P M Zurek,et al.  Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  B. Moore,et al.  Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  I. Winter,et al.  Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. L. Hall.  Auditory Distortion Products f2−f1 and 2f1−f2 , 1972 .

[17]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  Distortion products and the perceived pitch of harmonic complex tones , 2001 .

[18]  R. Burkard,et al.  The auditory evoked potential difference tone and cubic difference tone measured from the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  Dependence of level and phase of the (2f1−f2)‐cancellation tone on frequency range, frequency difference, level of primaries, and subject , 1981 .

[20]  E D Young,et al.  Neural organization and responses to complex stimuli in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  P. Pandya,et al.  Human frequency-following response correlates of the distortion product at 2F1-F2. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[22]  G C Galbraith,et al.  Two-channel brain-stem frequency-following responses to pure tone and missing fundamental stimuli. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Auditory distortion products measured with averaged auditory evoked potentials. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  Michael V Keebler,et al.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics? , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  P. Cariani,et al.  Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Resolvability of components in complex tones and implications for theories of pitch perception , 2011, Hearing Research.

[27]  Alan R. Palmer,et al.  Chapter 3 – Neural Signal Processing , 1995 .

[28]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: evidence for the locus of brainstem sources. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  Evan Balaban,et al.  An Auditory Neural Correlate Suggests a Mechanism Underlying Holistic Pitch Perception , 2007, PloS one.

[30]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones , 1987, Hearing Research.

[31]  K E Hecox,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of nonlinear distortion products to two-tone stimuli. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  E. Zwicker,et al.  On the dependence of (f2-f1) difference tones on subject and on additional masker. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Nicole M. Russo,et al.  Deficient brainstem encoding of pitch in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  Erika Skoe,et al.  Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in ASD and First-Degree Relatives , 2010, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[35]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Different behaviour of quadratic and cubic difference tones , 1979, Hearing Research.

[36]  R. Patterson.  Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Audibility region of combination tones , 1972 .

[38]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Receptor and neural responses in auditory masking of low frequency tones. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  Yung-hui Li.  Neural Signal Processing for fMRI Data , 2005 .

[40]  Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al.  Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[41]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Far-field recorded frequency-following responses: correlates of low pitch auditory perception in humans. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  M E Chertoff,et al.  Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  The Central Origin of the Pitch of Complex Tones: Evidence from Musical Interval Recognition , 1972 .

[44]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effect of noise on the detectability and fundamental frequency discrimination of complex tones. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Neural encoding in the human brainstem relevant to the pitch of complex tones , 2011, Hearing Research.

[46]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  The Frequency Following Response (FFR) May Reflect Pitch-Bearing Information But is Not a Direct Representation of Pitch , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[47]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds , 2008, Hearing Research.

[48]  J. L. Goldstein.  Auditory nonlinearity. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  R. Frisina.  Subcortical neural coding mechanisms for auditory temporal processing , 2001, Hearing Research.

[50]  Ray Meddis,et al.  The representation of periodic sounds in simulated sustained chopper units of the ventral cochlear nucleus. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.