Life cycle assessment of a biomass gasification combined-cycle power system

The potential environmental benefits from biomass power are numerous. However, biomass power may also have some negative effects on the environment. Although the environmental benefits and drawbacks of biomass power have been debated for some time, the total significance has not been assessed. This study serves to answer some of the questions most often raised in regard to biomass power: What are the net CO{sub 2} emissions? What is the energy balance of the integrated system? Which substances are emitted at the highest rates? What parts of the system are responsible for these emissions? To provide answers to these questions, a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a hypothetical biomass power plant located in the Midwest United States was performed. LCA is an analytical tool for quantifying the emissions, resource consumption, and energy use, collectively known as environmental stressors, that are associated with converting a raw material to a final product. Performed in conjunction with a t echnoeconomic feasibility study, the total economic and environmental benefits and drawbacks of a process can be quantified. This study complements a technoeconomic analysis of the same process, reported in Craig and Mann (1996) and updated here. The process studied is based on the conceptmore » of power Generation in a biomass integrated gasification combined cycle (BIGCC) plant. Broadly speaking, the overall system consists of biomass production, its transportation to the power plant, electricity generation, and any upstream processes required for system operation. The biomass is assumed to be supplied to the plant as wood chips from a biomass plantation, which would produce energy crops in a manner similar to the way food and fiber crops are produced today. Transportation of the biomass and other materials is by both rail and truck. The IGCC plant is sized at 113 MW, and integrates an indirectly-heated gasifier with an industrial gas turbine and steam cycle. 63 refs., 34 figs., 32 tabs.« less

[1]  C. Davis,et al.  ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN THE U.S. CHEMICAL FERTILIZER SYSTEM FROM THE GROUND TO THE GROUND , 1977 .

[2]  I. Boustead,et al.  Handbook of industrial energy analysis , 1979 .

[3]  B. Stout,et al.  Energy for world agriculture. , 1979 .

[4]  D. Pimentel Handbook of Energy Utilization In Agriculture , 1980 .

[5]  W. Lockeretz,et al.  Energy inputs for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potash fertilizers. , 1980 .

[6]  H. F. Feldmann,et al.  Conversion of forest residues to a methane-rich gas in a high-throughput gasifier. Summary report , 1981 .

[7]  R. Overend The average haul distance and transportation work factors for biomass delivered to a central plant , 1982 .

[8]  T. H. Allegri The Code of Federal Regulations , 1986 .

[9]  R. Ellington,et al.  Calculating the Net Greenhouse Warming Effect of Renewable Energy Resources: Methanol from Biomass , 1990 .

[10]  David R. Hodas,et al.  Environmental Costs of Electricity , 1990 .

[11]  M. Deluchi,et al.  Emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity , 1991 .

[12]  Robert D. Perlack,et al.  Emissions of C02 from energy crop production , 1991 .

[13]  R. Perlack,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL EMISSIONS AND SOCIOECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN THE PRODUCTION, STORAGE, AND TRANSPORTATION OF BIOMASS ENERGY FEEDSTOCKS , 1992 .

[14]  R. L. Bain Material and Energy Balances for Methanol from Biomass Using Biomass Gasifiers , 1992 .

[15]  John B. Kitto,et al.  Steam: Its Generation and Use , 1992 .

[16]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Should we store carbon in trees? , 1992 .

[17]  Robin L. Graham,et al.  The potential for short-rotation woody crops to reduce U.S. CO2 emissions , 1992 .

[18]  Charles R. McGowin,et al.  Strategic analysis of biomass and waste fuels for electric power generation , 1993 .

[19]  E. Hansen Soil carbon sequestration beneath hybrid poplar plantations in the North Central United States , 1993 .

[20]  R. Ellington,et al.  The net greenhouse warming forcing of methanol produced from biomass , 1993 .

[21]  DeLuchi Emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. Volume 2: Appendixes A--S , 1993 .

[22]  Steven C. Gebhard,et al.  Catalytic conditioning of synthesis gas produced by biomass gasification , 1994 .

[23]  J. Ranney,et al.  Environmental considerations in energy crop production , 1994 .

[24]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Reducing CO2 emissions by substituting biomass for fossil fuels , 1995 .

[25]  F. Parson,et al.  New bern biomass to energy project Phase I: Feasibility study , 1995 .

[26]  W. D. Kemper,et al.  Soil organic matter changes resulting from tillage and biomass production , 1995 .

[27]  D. E. Prinzing,et al.  Fundamental biofuel characteristics impacting coal-biomass cofiring , 1995 .

[28]  André Chamberland,et al.  Hydroelectricity, an option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from thermal power plants , 1996 .

[29]  G. Marland,et al.  Full fuel cycle carbon balances of bioenergy and forestry options. , 1996 .

[30]  Margaret K. Mann,et al.  Cost and performance analysis of biomass-based integrated gasification combined-cycle (BIGCC) power systems , 1996 .

[31]  V. R. Tolbert,et al.  Environmental effects of growing short-rotation woody crops on former agricultural lands , 1997 .

[32]  S. F. Actory,et al.  Personal correspondence , 1997 .

[33]  B. R. Bock,et al.  Environmental effects of growing woody crops on agricultural land: first year effects on erosion, and water quality , 1998 .

[34]  A. Bouwman,et al.  The role of soils and land use in the greenhouse effect , 2022 .