A network based approach to envisage potential accidents in offshore process facilities

Envisaging potential accidents in large scale offshore process facilities such as Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) is complex and could be best characterized through evolving scenarios. In the present work, a new methodology is developed to incorporate evolving scenarios in a single model and predicts the likelihood of accident. The methodology comprises; (a) evolving scenario identification, (b) accident consequence framework development, (c) accident scenario likelihood estimation, and (d) ranking of the scenarios. Resulting events in the present work are modeled using a Bayesian network approach, which represents accident scenarios as cause‐consequences networks. The methodology developed in this article is compared with case studies of ammonia and Liquefied Natural Gas from chemical and offshore process facility, respectively. The proposed method is able to differentiate the consequence of specific events and predict probabilities for such events along with continual updating of consequence probabilities of fire and explosion scenarios taking into account. The developed methodology can be used to envisage evolving scenarios that occur in the offshore oil and gas process industry; however, with further modification it can be applied to different sections of marine industry to predict the likelihood of such accidents. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 36: 178–191, 2017

[1]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Modelling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach , 2010 .

[2]  Gary F. Bennett,et al.  Lees’ Loss Prevention in the Process Industries: Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control, third ed., Mannan Sam (Ed.). Elsevier Butterworths Heinemann, Burlington, MA (2005), three-volume set, 0-7506-7857-7 (vol. I), US$ 476.00 (for three-volume set), 1439 pp., ISBN 0-7506-7555-1 , 2005 .

[3]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Causal factors in accidents of high-speed craft and conventional ocean-going vessels , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[5]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels , 2006, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[6]  Marcelo C. M. Teixeira,et al.  Discrete-Time Sliding Mode Control for Uncertain Networked System Subject to Time Delay , 2015 .

[7]  Shahid Abbas Abbasi,et al.  Major accidents in process industries and an analysis of causes and consequences , 1999 .

[8]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Quantifying Occupational Risk: The Development of an Occupational Risk Model , 2008 .

[9]  Coen Van Gulijk,et al.  Towards BBN based risk modelling of process plants , 2014 .

[10]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Developing a quantitative risk-based methodology for maintenance scheduling using Bayesian Network , 2016 .

[11]  Dedy Ng,et al.  Common lessons learned from an analysis of multiple case histories , 2011 .

[12]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Faisal I. Khan,et al.  MAXCRED - a new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries , 1998, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  M. Elisabeth,et al.  Learning from the Piper Alpha Accident: A Postmortem Analysis of Technical and Organizational Factors , 1993 .

[15]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Dynamic risk analysis of offloading process in floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) platform using Bayesian Network , 2016 .

[16]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  On the development of failure models for hydrocarbon leaks during maintenance work in process plants on offshore petroleum installations , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Jon Ivar Håvold,et al.  Safety culture and safety management aboard tankers , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  J Van Ryzin,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment. , 1980, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[19]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[20]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Modelling of fire risks in an offshore facility , 2015 .

[21]  Michael F. Bemis Disasters and Tragic Events: An Encyclopedia of Catastrophes in American History , 2014 .

[22]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network , 2013 .

[23]  Kevin B. Korb,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence, Second Edition , 2010 .

[24]  Daniel Zelterman,et al.  Bayesian Artificial Intelligence , 2005, Technometrics.

[25]  electronic resource Guidelines for evaluating process plant buildings for external explosions and fire , 2013 .

[26]  Li Zhang,et al.  Quantitative Risk Analysis of Offshore Fire and Explosion Based on the Analysis of Human and Organizational Factors , 2015 .

[27]  Tahir Husain,et al.  Risk-based process safety assessment and control measures design for offshore process facilities. , 2002, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Use Maximum-Credible Accident Scenarios for Realistic and Reliable Risk Assessment , 2001 .

[29]  Brian Veitch,et al.  A Grid Based Approach for Fire and Explosion Consequence Analysis , 2006 .

[30]  Lars Roar Skarsbø,et al.  An Experimental Study of Pool Fires and Validation of Different CFD Fire Models , 2011 .

[31]  Trevor Kletz Process Safety—An Engineering Achievement , 1991 .

[32]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Explosion modeling and analysis of BP Deepwater Horizon accident , 2013 .

[33]  H. Bohnenblust,et al.  A methodology for assessing catastropic damage to the population and environment: A quantitative multi‐attribute approach for risk analysis based on fuzzy set theory , 1994 .

[34]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Accident Hazard Index: A Multi-Attribute Method for Process Industry Hazard Rating , 1997 .

[35]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  On the use of the hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Pavel Senovsky,et al.  LNG as a potential alternative fuel – Safety and security of storage facilities , 2011 .

[37]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Jet fires and the domino effect , 2008 .

[38]  Robin Pitblado,et al.  LNG Risk Based Safety: Modeling and Consequence Analysis , 1994 .

[39]  Nikolaos P Ventikos,et al.  Spill accident modeling: a critical survey of the event-decision network in the context of IMO's formal safety assessment. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[40]  Duncan Smith,et al.  A practical approach to fire hazard analysis for offshore structures. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[41]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Towards a causal model for air transport safety—an ongoing research project , 2006 .

[42]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Modeling of BP Texas City refinery incident , 2007 .

[43]  Consultant,et al.  Lessons from Texas City A Case History , 2006 .

[44]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[45]  Ccps Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[46]  Faisal Khan,et al.  An integrated approach for fire and explosion consequence modelling , 2013 .

[47]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Further development of a Causal model for Air Transport Safety (CATS): Building the mathematical heart , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[48]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Offshore Risk Assessment: Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies , 1999 .

[49]  En Sup Yoon,et al.  Safety Assessment of LNG Terminal Focused on the Consequence Analysis of LNG Spills , 2009 .

[50]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Fundamentals of Fires and Explosions , 2010 .

[51]  J Wang,et al.  An analysis of fishing vessel accidents. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[52]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries , 1998 .

[53]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[54]  Norman E. Scheffler Improved fire and explosion index hazard classification , 1994 .

[55]  M. Paté-Cornell Learning from the Piper Alpha Accident: A Postmortem Analysis of Technical and Organizational Factors , 1993 .

[56]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Causes of occupational accidents in the fishing sector in Portugal , 2008 .

[57]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Network based approach for predictive accident modelling , 2015 .

[58]  G. L. Wells Major Hazards and Their Management , 1997 .

[59]  Renato Rota,et al.  Rainout Assessment After a Release of Hazardous Liquefied Gas: Effect of Physical and Storage Parameters , 2011 .

[60]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Revised fire consequence models for offshore quantitative risk assessment , 2005 .