Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints

Metaphase checkpoint controls sense abnormalities of chromosome alignment during mitosis and prevent progression to anaphase until proper alignment has been attained. A number of proteins, including mad2, bub1, and bubR1, have been implicated in the metaphase checkpoint control in mammalian cells. Metaphase checkpoints have been shown, in various systems, to read loss of either spindle tension or microtubule attachment at the kinetochore. Characteristically, HeLa cells arrest in metaphase in response to low levels of microtubule inhibitors that leave an intact spindle and a metaphase plate. Here we show that the arrest induced by nanomolar vinblastine correlates with loss of tension at the kinetochore, and that in response the checkpoint proteins bub1 and bubR1 are recruited to the kinetochore but mad2 is not. mad2 remains competent to respond and is recruited at higher drug doses that disrupt spindle association with the kinetochores. Further, although mad2 forms a complex with cdc20, it does not associate with bub1 or bubR1. We conclude that mammalian bub1/bubR1 and mad2 operate as elements of distinct pathways sensing tension and attachment, respectively.

[1]  Bert Vogelstein,et al.  Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers , 1998, Nature.

[2]  Yun Zheng,et al.  CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[3]  A. Amon The spindle checkpoint. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[4]  G. Chan,et al.  Human Bubr1 Is a Mitotic Checkpoint Kinase That Monitors Cenp-E Functions at Kinetochores and Binds the Cyclosome/APC , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  J. R. Daum,et al.  Mammalian p55CDC Mediates Association of the Spindle Checkpoint Protein Mad2 with the Cyclosome/Anaphase-promoting Complex, and is Involved in Regulating Anaphase Onset and Late Mitotic Events , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  The Human Homologue of Bub3 Is Required for Kinetochore Localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related Protein Kinase , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  P. Sorger,et al.  Chromosome Missegregation and Apoptosis in Mice Lacking the Mitotic Checkpoint Protein Mad2 , 2000, Cell.

[8]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast , 1991, Cell.

[9]  E. Salmon,et al.  Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[10]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. , 1999, Science.

[11]  M. Jordan,et al.  Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles. Implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[12]  B. Roberts,et al.  S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function , 1991, Cell.

[13]  M. Jordan,et al.  Mechanism of inhibition of cell proliferation by Vinca alkaloids. , 1991, Cancer research.

[14]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation and the chromosome distribution checkpoint in praying mantid spermatocytes. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[15]  M. Kirschner,et al.  The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. , 1998, Genes & development.

[16]  Stephen S. Taylor,et al.  Kinetochore Localization of Murine Bub1 Is Required for Normal Mitotic Timing and Checkpoint Response to Spindle Damage , 1997, Cell.

[17]  K M Hahn,et al.  Dynamic elastic behavior of alpha-satellite DNA domains visualized in situ in living human cells , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[19]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Spindle Checkpoint Protein Xmad1 Recruits Xmad2 to Unattached Kinetochores , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  B. Schaar,et al.  Characterization of the Kinetochore Binding Domain of CENP-E Reveals Interactions with the Kinetochore Proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1 , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  M. Jordan,et al.  Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[22]  R. Margolis,et al.  Microtubule dependency of p34cdc2 inactivation and mitotic exit in mammalian cells , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  A. Murray,et al.  Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. , 2000, Science.

[24]  A. Murray,et al.  Microinjection of Antibody to Mad2 Protein into Mammalian Cells in Mitosis Induces Premature Anaphase , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Association of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Component XMAD2 with Unattached Kinetochores , 1996, Science.

[26]  C. Rieder,et al.  Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint , 1995, Nature.

[29]  A Khodjakov,et al.  The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  K. Buttle,et al.  Kinetochore Fiber Maturation in PtK1 Cells and Its Implications for the Mechanisms of Chromosome Congression and Anaphase Onset , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  E. Salmon,et al.  The role of pre- and post-anaphase microtubules in the cytokinesis phase of the cell cycle , 2000, Current Biology.

[32]  R. Benezra,et al.  Identification of a Human Mitotic Checkpoint Gene: hsMAD2 , 1996, Science.

[33]  A. Murray,et al.  Localization of Mad2 to Kinetochores Depends on Microtubule Attachment, Not Tension , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  R. Dawe,et al.  The Maize Homologue of the Cell Cycle Checkpoint Protein MAD2 Reveals Kinetochore Substructure and Contrasting Mitotic and Meiotic Localization Patterns , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.