Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers for Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention

We investigated whether protection from coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke conferred by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in hypertensive or high-risk patients may be explained by the specific drug regimen. We extracted summary statistics regarding CHD and stroke from 28 outcome trials that compared either ACEIs or CCBs with diuretics, β-blockers, or placebo for a total of 179 122 patients, 9509 incident cases of CHD, and 5971 cases of stroke. CHD included myocardial infarction and coronary death. In placebo-controlled trials, ACEIs decreased the risk of CHD (P<0.001), and CCBs reduced stroke incidence (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in CHD risk between regimens based on diuretics/β-blockers and regimens based on ACEIs (P=0.46) or CCBs (P=0.52). The risk of stroke was reduced by CCBs (P=0.041) but not by ACEIs (P=0.15) compared with diuretics/β-blockers. Because heterogeneity between trials was significant, we investigated potential sources of heterogeneity by metaregression. Examined covariates were the reduction in systolic blood pressure (BP), drug treatment (ACEIs versus CCBs), their interaction term, sex, age at randomization, year of publication, and duration of treatment. Prevention of CHD was explained by systolic BP reduction (P<0.001) and use of ACEIs (P=0.028), whereas prevention of stroke was explained by systolic BP reduction (P=0.001) and use of CCBs (P=0.042). These findings confirm that BP lowering is fundamental for prevention of CHD and stroke. However, over and beyond BP reduction, ACEIs appear superior to CCBs for prevention of CHD, whereas CCBs appear superior to ACEIs for prevention of stroke.

[1]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition in stable coronary artery disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Effect of long-acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with stable angina requiring treatment (ACTION trial): randomised controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[3]  J. Laragh,et al.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[4]  Eric J Topol,et al.  Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[5]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[6]  F. Turnbull.  Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials , 2003, The Lancet.

[7]  K. Fox,et al.  Efficacy of perindopril in reduction of cardiovascular events among patients with stable coronary artery disease: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (the EUROPA study) , 2003, The Lancet.

[8]  D. Sica,et al.  A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. , 2003, Current hypertension reports.

[9]  J. Staessen,et al.  Cardiovascular prevention and blood pressure reduction: a quantitative overview updated until 1 March 2003 , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[10]  Peter Sleight,et al.  Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[11]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Overt Nephropathy , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  C. Reid,et al.  A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  G. Mancia,et al.  Treatment of Isolated Systolic Hypertension: The SHELL Study Results , 2003, Blood pressure.

[14]  B. Davis,et al.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). , 2002, JAMA.

[15]  G. Mancia,et al.  Calcium Antagonist Lacidipine Slows Down Progression of Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis: Principal Results of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a Randomized, Double-Blind, Long-Term Trial , 2002, Circulation.

[16]  Jan A Staessen,et al.  The prevention of dementia with antihypertensive treatment: new evidence from the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) study. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  J. Peleska,et al.  Circulating intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, endothelin-1 and von Willebrand factor-markers of endothelial dysfunction in uncomplicated essential hypertension: the effect of treatment with ACE inhibitors , 2002, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[18]  G. Lip,et al.  Effects of enalapril and losartan on circulating adhesion molecules and monocyte chemotactic protein-1. , 2002, Clinical science.

[19]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  Jan A Staessen,et al.  Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  M. Woodward,et al.  Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood pressure lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack , 2001 .

[22]  D. Johnston.  Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack , 2001, The Lancet.

[23]  E. Lewis,et al.  Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Kukin Ml.  The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study. , 2001, Current cardiology reports.

[25]  R. Davidson,et al.  Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of Rosuvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  W. Desmet,et al.  Usefulness of Nisoldipine for prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (results of the NICOLE study). NIsoldipine in COronary artery disease in LEuven. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  K. Teo,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Cholesterol Lowering and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition on Coronary Atherosclerosis: The Simvastatin/Enalapril Coronary Atherosclerosis Trial (SCAT) , 2000, Circulation.

[28]  John S. Scott,et al.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, in patients with coronary or other occlusive arterial disease. PART-2 Collaborative Research Group. Prevention of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  Giuseppe Mancia,et al.  Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) , 2000, The Lancet.

[30]  Thomas Hedner,et al.  Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and β-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study , 2000, The Lancet.

[31]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. , 2000 .

[32]  T. Hedner,et al.  Randomised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients: cardiovascular mortality and morbidity the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 study , 1999, The Lancet.

[33]  J. Staessen,et al.  Update on the systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial. The Syst-Eur Investigators. , 1999, Hypertension.

[34]  C. Bulpitt,et al.  Effects of Calcium-Channel Blockade in Older Patients with Diabetes and Systolic Hypertension , 1999 .

[35]  L. Niskanen,et al.  Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[36]  P. Fasching,et al.  Fosinopril decreases levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in borderline hypertensive type II diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. , 1998, American journal of hypertension.

[37]  J A Staessen,et al.  Comparison of active treatment and placebo in older Chinese patients with isolated systolic hypertension , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[38]  A. Zanchetti,et al.  The Verapamil in Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Study (VHAS): Results of long‐term randomized treatment with either verapamil or chlorthalidone on carotid intima‐media thickness , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[39]  Philip D. Harvey,et al.  Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39 , 1998, BMJ.

[40]  S. Oshima,et al.  The effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor imidapril on plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor activity in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, American heart journal.

[41]  C. Furberg,et al.  Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT). , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[42]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[43]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Effects of ramipril on plasma fibrinolytic balance in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction. HEART Study Investigators. , 1997, Circulation.

[44]  M. Rocco,et al.  Final outcome results of the Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS). A randomized controlled trial. , 1996, JAMA.

[45]  P. Hamet,et al.  Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly (STONE). , 1996, Journal of hypertension.

[46]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[47]  R. Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. , 1994, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[48]  Philippe Amouyel,et al.  Deletion polymorphism in the gene for angiotensin-converting enzyme is a potent risk factor for myocardial infarction , 1992, Nature.

[49]  J. Laragh,et al.  Association of the renin-sodium profile with the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context , 1990, The Lancet.

[51]  R. Collins,et al.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias , 1990, The Lancet.

[52]  A. Slabý,et al.  [Plasma renin activity and ischemic heart disease]. , 1975, Casopis lekaru ceskych.