Normalizasyon Yöntemlerinin Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Sürecine Etkisi–Moora Yöntemi İncelemesi

Isletmeler cok sayida degerlendirme olcutunu bir arada gozonune alarak alternatifler arasinda secim yapmak durumundadirlar. Bu degerlendirme olcutlerinin olcum birimlerinin ayni olmasi durumu ise gercek hayatta hemen hemen imkansizdir. Olcum birimleri farkli olan olcutleri birarada incelemek icin kullanilan yontemler cok olcutlu karar verme yontemleri adiyla anilmaktadir. Cok olcutlu karar verme yontemlerinde olcum birimleri farkli olan olcutleri incelemek icin kullanilan cesitli normalizasyon yontemleri mevcuttur. Farkli cok olcutlu karar verme yontemleri farkli normalizasyon yontemleri kullanmakta hatta ayni yontem icin literaturde farkli normalizasyon yontemlerinin kullanildigi bile gorulmektedir. Bu calismanin amaci farkli normalizasyon yontemlerinin alinan kararda bir degisiklik yaratip yaratmadigini incelemektir. Bu amacla veri setleri turetilerek Moora cok olcutlu karar verme yontemi icin farkli normalizasyon yontemleri uygulanmis ve tercih sirasinin degisip degismedigi incelenmistir

[1]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Robustness of the multi‐objective MOORA method with a test for the facilities sector , 2009 .

[3]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Model for a Complex Analysis of Intelligent Built Environment , 2010 .

[4]  M. Parsa Moghaddam,et al.  Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets , 2010 .

[5]  Yong Zhang,et al.  An incident information management framework based on data integration, data mining, and multi-criteria decision making , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Jianfang Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the Profitability of Power Listed Companies Based on Entropy Improved TOPSIS Method , 2011 .

[7]  V. P. Agrawal,et al.  Coding, evaluation and optimal selection of a mechatronic system , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Feargal Brennan,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures , 2011 .

[9]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment , 2011 .

[10]  Keivan Sadeghzadeh,et al.  Mathematical analysis of fuel cell strategic technologies development solutions in the automotive industry by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision making method , 2011 .

[11]  D. Štreimikienė,et al.  Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach , 2012 .

[12]  Wei Huang,et al.  Research on the Performance Evaluation of Chongqing Electric Power Supply Bureaus Based on TOPSIS , 2012 .

[13]  Alvydas Balezentis,et al.  Personnel selection based on computing with words and fuzzy MULTIMOORA , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Manik Chandra Das,et al.  A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology , 2012 .

[15]  S. Chakraborty,et al.  Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection , 2012 .

[16]  Serge Domenech,et al.  Economic and environmental strategies for process design , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Jordi Gallego-Ayala,et al.  Selecting irrigation water pricing alternatives using a multi-methodological approach , 2012, Math. Comput. Model..